Blair Bethwaite wrote: > There is a not insignificant degree of irony in the fact that this > conversation has splintered so that anyone only reading > openstack-operators and/or user-committee is missing 90% of the > picture.... Maybe I just need a new ML management strategy.
That irony is not lost on me, and no ML management strategy can help. Currently for a ops+dev discussion we have 4 options: start it on -dev (miss ops), start it on -ops (miss devs), cross-post (and miss random messages that are lost as subscribers don't match, or people don't reply to both), or try to post separate variants (but then you have to follow both ends, and your replies miss half the audience). We tried the 4th option this time -- was a fail but then there are no good option in the current setup. Setting up a common ML for common discussions (openstack-sigs) will really help, even if there will be some pain setting them up and getting the right readership to them :) -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) _______________________________________________ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
