Thanks for sharing Melvin, One major point here is that it's not clear how this proposal relates to the recent discussion around OpenStack SIGs. It's clear that more than a few of us are still struggling to understand intuitively why we are calling one thing a Working Group and another a Team, even when there are specific some requirements listed against them. Perhaps part of the problem is that the monikers themselves convey no meaning? I wonder if we could we do away with Team and instead have SIGs and Working Groups...?
Cheers, On 13 July 2017 at 07:01, Melvin Hillsman <mrhills...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hey everyone, > > Please take time today to offer any additional comments/questions/concerns > to the following document - > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1r3KwaG-SbvaKCuAE52XwPCF7cRGDrNRg6dUhPQWs0vU > > This document establishes the requirements for current and future UC > governed working groups and teams. We need to ensure we have this done > before upcoming UC election so your feedback is greatly appreciated. > > > -- > Kind regards, > > OpenStack User Committee > > (Edgar, Jon, Melvin, Shamail, Shilla) -- Cheers, ~Blairo _______________________________________________ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
