I missed this session but the discussion strikes a chord as this is something I've been saying on my user survey every 6 months.
On 11 November 2017 at 09:51, John Dickinson <m...@not.mn> wrote: > What I heard from ops in the room is that they want (to start) one release a > year who's branch isn't deleted after a year. What if that's exactly what we > did? I propose that OpenStack only do one release a year instead of two. We > still keep N-2 stable releases around. We still do backports to all open > stable branches. We still do all the things we're doing now, we just do it > once a year instead of twice. +1 -- Cheers, ~Blairo _______________________________________________ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators