I think nested quotas would give the same thing, i.e. you have a parent project for the group and child projects for the users. This would not need user/group quotas but continue with the ‘project owns resources’ approach.
It can be generalised to other use cases like the value add partner or the research experiment working groups (http://openstack-in-production.blogspot.fr/2017/07/nested-quota-models.html) Tim From: Zhipeng Huang <zhipengh...@gmail.com> Reply-To: "openstack-s...@lists.openstack.org" <openstack-s...@lists.openstack.org> Date: Wednesday, 7 March 2018 at 17:37 To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <openstack-...@lists.openstack.org>, openstack-operators <openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org>, "openstack-s...@lists.openstack.org" <openstack-s...@lists.openstack.org> Subject: Re: [Openstack-sigs] [openstack-dev] [keystone] [oslo] new unified limit library This is certainly a feature will make Public Cloud providers very happy :) On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 12:33 AM, Tim Bell <tim.b...@cern.ch<mailto:tim.b...@cern.ch>> wrote: Sorry, I remember more detail now... it was using the 'owner' of the VM as part of the policy rather than quota. Is there a per-user/per-group quota in Nova? Tim -----Original Message----- From: Tim Bell <tim.b...@cern.ch<mailto:tim.b...@cern.ch>> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <openstack-...@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-...@lists.openstack.org>> Date: Wednesday, 7 March 2018 at 17:29 To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <openstack-...@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-...@lists.openstack.org>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] [oslo] new unified limit library There was discussion that Nova would deprecate the user quota feature since it really didn't fit well with the 'projects own resources' approach and was little used. At one point, some of the functionality stopped working and was repaired. The use case we had identified goes away if you have 2 level deep nested quotas (and we have now worked around it). Tim -----Original Message----- From: Lance Bragstad <lbrags...@gmail.com<mailto:lbrags...@gmail.com>> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <openstack-...@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-...@lists.openstack.org>> Date: Wednesday, 7 March 2018 at 16:51 To: "openstack-...@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-...@lists.openstack.org>" <openstack-...@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-...@lists.openstack.org>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] [oslo] new unified limit library On 03/07/2018 09:31 AM, Chris Friesen wrote: > On 03/07/2018 08:58 AM, Lance Bragstad wrote: >> Hi all, >> ] > > 1) Nova currently supports quotas for a user/group tuple that can be > stricter than the overall quotas for that group. As far as I know no > other project supports this. ... I think the initial implementation of a unified limit pattern is targeting limits and quotas for things associated to projects. In the future, we can probably expand on the limit information in keystone to include user-specific limits, which would be great if nova wants to move away from handling that kind of stuff. > > Chris > > __________________________________________________________________________ > > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: > openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe<http://openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe<http://openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe<http://openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Zhipeng (Howard) Huang Standard Engineer IT Standard & Patent/IT Product Line Huawei Technologies Co,. Ltd Email: huangzhip...@huawei.com<mailto:huangzhip...@huawei.com> Office: Huawei Industrial Base, Longgang, Shenzhen (Previous) Research Assistant Mobile Ad-Hoc Network Lab, Calit2 University of California, Irvine Email: zhipe...@uci.edu<mailto:zhipe...@uci.edu> Office: Calit2 Building Room 2402 OpenStack, OPNFV, OpenDaylight, OpenCompute Aficionado
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
