On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 1:39 PM, Matt Riedemann <mriede...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I know you're just one case, but I don't know how many people are really > running the CachingScheduler with ironic either, so it might be rare. It > would be nice to get other operator input here, like I'm guessing CERN has > their cells carved up so that certain cells are only serving baremetal > requests while other cells are only VMs?
I found FilterScheduler to be near impossible to use with Ironic due to the huge number of hypervisors it had to handle. Using CachingScheduler made a huge difference, like day and night. > FWIW, I think we can also backport the data migration CLI to stable branches > once we have it available so you can do your migration in let's say Queens > before getting to Rocky. -- Mathieu _______________________________________________ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
