On May 25, 2018 5:30:40 AM PDT, Doug Hellmann <d...@doughellmann.com> wrote: >Excerpts from Jonathan D. Proulx's message of 2018-05-24 07:19:29 >-0700: >> >> My intention based on current understandign would be to create a git >> repo called "osops-docs" as this fits current naming an thin initial >> document we intend to put there and the others we may adopt from >> docs-team. > >Normally I would say "yay, consistency!" In this case, let's verify >that that name isn't going to have an undesirable effect when the >content is published. > >I know the default destination directory for the publish job is >taken from the repository name, which would mean we would have a >URL like docs.openstack.org/osops-docs. I don't know if there is a >way to override that, but the infra team will know. So, if you want >a URL like docs.o.o/operations-guide instead, you'll want to check >with the infra folks before creating the repo to make sure it's set >up in a way to get the URL you want.
Names are hard! Thanks for pointing out the implications. -Jon -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. _______________________________________________ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators