On 2/6/2018 6:44 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
On 2/6/2018 2:14 PM, Chris Apsey wrote:
but we would rather have intermittent build failures rather than compute nodes falling over in the future.

Note that once a compute has a successful build, the consecutive build failures counter is reset. So if your limit is the default (10) and you have 10 failures in a row, the compute service is auto-disabled. But if you have say 5 failures and then a pass, it's reset to 0 failures.

Obviously if you're doing a pack-first scheduling strategy rather than spreading instances across the deployment, a burst of failures could easily disable a compute, especially if that host is overloaded like you saw. I'm not sure if rescheduling is helping you or not - that would be useful information since we consider the need to reschedule off a failed compute host as a bad thing. At the Forum in Boston when this idea came up, it was specifically for the case that operators in the room didn't want a bad compute to become a "black hole" in their deployment causing lots of reschedules until they get that one fixed.

Just an update on this. There is a change merged in Rocky [1] which is also going through backports to Queens and Pike. If you've already disabled the "consecutive_build_service_disable_threshold" config option then it's a no-op. If you haven't, "consecutive_build_service_disable_threshold" is now used to count build failures but no longer auto-disable the compute service on the configured threshold is met (10 by default). The build failure count is then used by a new weigher (enabled by default) to sort hosts with build failures to the back of the list of candidate hosts for new builds. Once there is a successful build on a given host, the failure count is reset. The idea here is that hosts which are failing are given lower priority during scheduling.

[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/572195/

--

Thanks,

Matt

_______________________________________________
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

Reply via email to