On 9/12/2018 5:32 PM, Melvin Hillsman wrote:
We basically spent the day focusing on two things specific to what you
bring up and are in agreement with you regarding action not just talk
around feedback and outreach. [1]
We wiped the agenda clean, discussed our availability (set reasonable
expectations), and revisited how we can be more diligent and successful
around these two principles which target your first comment, "...get
their RFE/bug list ranked from the operator community (because some of
the requests are not exclusive to public cloud), and then put pressure
on the TC to help project manage the delivery of the top issue..."
I will not get into much detail because again this response is specific
to a portion of your email so in keeping with feedback and outreach the
UC is making it a point to be intentional. We have already got action
items [2] which target the concern you raise. We have agreed to hold
each other accountable and adjusted our meeting structure to facilitate
being successful.
Not that the UC (elected members) are the only ones who can do this but
we believe it is our responsibility to; regardless of what anyone else
does. The UC is also expected to enlist others and hopefully through our
efforts others are encouraged participate and enlist others.
[1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/uc-stein-ptg
[2] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/UC-Election-Qualifications
Awesome, thank you Melvin and others on the UC.
--
Thanks,
Matt
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
