Jay Pipes wrote: > As for the API coordinator, I thought we had already voted yes on that?
My position on the "API coordinator" is that there is no need for amending our governance and creating an official position for that. I'm all in favor of a technical meritocracy where someone that cares about a subject (or is paid to care about a subject) and does a great job of owning the subject ends up being respected by his peers and be responsible for it. So if Jorge wants to work on API guidelines and convergence efforts, I don't think that needs to be voted by the PPB beforehand. He can just start working on that and do a great job at it. And anyone interested can join him. The PPB /could/ be called to resolve conflicts (between PTLs, or between people working on API guideliens and PTLs) if there are any, under its attribution of ensuring "commonality" and "integration" between projects -- but I surely hope concerns can be directly addressed between the interested parties. And by the way (and before anyone inserts snarky comments), that also applies to the release management job. Anyone interested is free to help me there. And everyone can ultimately appeal to the PPB if there is disagreement. This is a duty, not a set of rights. -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) Release Manager, OpenStack _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc Post to : openstack-poc@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp