Sounds good. Since we didn't have any other items before the cutoff, no meeting tomorrow.
On Jan 30, 2012, at 5:49 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: > No, that's fine as a status update. No need to bring this up tomorrow. > > Thanks Jason! > -jay > > On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Jonathan Bryce <jbr...@jbryce.com> wrote: >> Thanks, Jason. >> >> Jay, do you still want to discuss this live tomorrow? >> >> >> >> On Jan 30, 2012, at 3:45 PM, Jason Kölker wrote: >> >>> On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 13:11 -0500, Jay Pipes wrote: >>>> Would it be possible to get an update on the OpenStack Common project >>>> from Jason/MarkM/DanW? I'm interested to learn what progress has been >>>> made and whether we can expect to see more common code alignment in >>>> Essex or Folsom... >>> >>> I think Folsom is more likely to start seeing some more common code. Dan >>> gave us some pointers to things in Quantum that he'd like to see ported >>> over to common. Rajaram was going to start looking into adding a >>> notification system with plugins, not sure if any progress has been made >>> on that front. >>> >>> I can only speak for myself, but I unfortunately won't be able to spend >>> much time on it until after we finish our launch, but after that I'm >>> going to make sure I get some time set aside in a few sprints to start >>> pulling things in and proposing for incubation. First on my list would >>> be using entry_points for defining services/daemons and console_scripts >>> dynamically. >>> >>> Happy Hacking! >>> >>> 7-11 >>> >> _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc Post to : openstack-poc@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
