Yup. On Jan 14, 2011 10:05 AM, "Jay Pipes" <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 11:28 AM, John Purrier <[email protected]> wrote: >> Another thought, as we envision moving OpenStack forward we will likely be including code and projects that are not written in Python. Being forward looking should we structure openstack-common to segment along language lines? > > That wasn't the original intent of openstack-common, but I suppose we > could adapt it. Generally, though, I've found that open source > libraries are separated by language. I don't think I've seen a > packaged open-source library that served two languages. I think for > other languages (especially bindings), it's better to have them in a > separate project that can be packaged according to the customs of that > programming language/platform. > > -jay
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
