If more documentation enables deployers to properly deploy Nova, it's in scope. At least, that's my opinion.
-jay On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Andy Smith <andys...@gmail.com> wrote: > My understanding is that the paste.deploy config is unrelated to the flags > system and is rather separate in scope. > > On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Jay Pipes <jaypi...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 6:41 AM, Armando Migliaccio >> <armando.migliac...@eu.citrix.com> wrote: >> > I have noticed that recently a new way of configuring nova-api has been >> > introduced. It seems that the old gflags style has been replaced in >> > favour >> > of paste.deploy style. >> > >> > I am trying to find information about this transition, and how old >> > config >> > files can be translated to new ones. Do we just past the flags under the >> > [DEFAULT] section? I am also wondering if this is going to be done for >> > other >> > services other than nova-api. >> > >> > This blueprint does not seem to have a lot of information. >> >> Hey Todd and Anne, >> >> Think we can add a bit of documentation about this? Armando, can you >> file a bug so that we can track the documentation needs? >> >> Thanks! >> jay >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack >> Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net >> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack >> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > > _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
