On 04/24/2011 08:27 PM, Soren Hansen wrote: > There are still *big* projects that still use subversion or even CVS > (e.g. OpenBSD) and manage to stay productive.
Yes right. So let's go back to use RCS, I'm sure you'll find some projects still using it! :) On 04/24/2011 08:27 PM, Soren Hansen wrote: > Well, that's just silly. On a *really* busy day, I might create 5, > 6 or perhaps even 10 branches, but I make perhaps 50-70 commits. > Why would the cost of creating branches be so much more interesting > that you think the time to do anything else *at all* doesn't matter? Because a commit will always take a very small amount of time, even if the project is big (eg: about 15 seconds, even on the linux kernel, and for both git and bzr...). That's currently not truth with a bzr branch (on a big project), which will always push you to go away take a cup of coffee 5, 6 or perhaps even 10 times, reducing your productivity, and making you incredibly addicted to coffee. :) By the way, I can't even think of making 10 branches a day! My head would explode, and I wouldn't know what they would be for... :) And that's precisely what I am not used and dislike with bzr. Thomas _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
