On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 7:58 PM, Jorge Williams <jorge.willi...@rackspace.com> wrote: > On May 3, 2011, at 6:29 PM, Eldar Nugaev wrote: >> Could you please provide information - why we want to see "values" >> field in JSON and who is responsable for implementation this >> specification in OS API 1.1? >> > > We use "values" as a first attempt to add extensibility to collections in > JSON. We had a lengthy discussion about this at the summit. To summarize: > there's no really easy/clean way of doing this as JSON is not extensible.
Hmm, I might have summarized our discussion differently :P > We're currently exploring other approaches, so values may go away in the long > term. The 1.1 spec is not set in stone in this regard. Right. I think we came to a decision to try running the XML through an automated JSON-ifier and using the output of that as a starting point. -jay _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
