Vish:

For heterogeneous architecture support, we (ISI) need to:
- Finalize how to represent architecture-specific info (either using current 
implementation of new columns in db schema, or using a more generic mechanism 
such as extra-data or zones)
- Possibly redo our arch-aware scheduler using Justin's advanced scheduler 
and/or distributed scheduler with zones

For bare metal provisioning (needs a blueprint):
 -  goal is to define a compute service proxy interface that will allow people 
to plug in third party provisioning solutions into nova


Lorin
--
Lorin Hochstein, Computer Scientist
USC Information Sciences Institute
703.812.3710
http://www.east.isi.edu/~lorin

On May 2, 2011, at 6:22 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya wrote:

> Hey Everyone,
> 
> I thought it would be nice to give everyone an update of the decisions made 
> during the Design Summit.  There are a lot of follow-on actions.  I'll be 
> spending the next week trying to get everything missing into blueprints and 
> targeted to milestones, so that there is a cohesive view of the features 
> being worked on for the Diablo release.  There are still a number of tasks 
> for Nova that need to be done but have no one assigned.  I will list them 
> below, but I will also be sending out specific emails to get volunteers for 
> individual topics.
> 
> The information below is based on notes that I took during the various 
> meetings.  I attempted to collect as many of the action items related to Nova 
> as possible.  Unfortunately, I wasn't in all of the sessions, and I'm sure I 
> missed a few things. If others have additions/changes, please feel free to 
> contribute them.
> 
> I will also be sending out a list of milestones and dates so everyone can 
> attempt to coordinate their development cycles with the official Nova 
> milestones.
> 
> Vish
> 
> Diablo Design Summit Notes and Actions (* represents blueprints that need to 
> be made)
> 
> Six-Month Release Cycle
>       OpenStack will move to a six month release cycle
>       Releases will adopt the NVIE model -- Separate QA branch with bugfixes 
> only merged in
>       Project PTLs responsible for creating and assigning a QA team to manage 
> the QA branch for release
> 
> Milestones
>       Between the six-month releases, individual projects can manage their 
> own cadence for releases
>       Unless a project has a good reason to change, it should adopt the 
> default of one month milestones
>       Milestones are not supported releases, but should expose stable new 
> functionality
>       Milestones will be used to target features and help ease the 
> project-management burden
> 
> Shared Code and New Projects
>       Volume and Network code will initially not be separated into separate 
> projects
>       DB and API for volume and network should be separated within NOVA (*)
>       Clear high-level apis will be defined for these components so other 
> projects can replace them
>       Shared code will be moved into a subfolder in nova for a possible move 
> into nova-common (*)
>       Where applicable, libraries should be created for shared functionality 
> (allows for external reuse)
>       init/daemonization code from swift / glance will be moved into a 
> library and used by all services
>       We will investigate a way to standardize on logging as well (*)
> 
> API Definition Process
>       We will strive to minimize duplicate APIs (glance and servers /image 
> for example)
>       API changes should be proposed along with features and considered 
> during feature development
>       Minor API features could change in milestones but the versioned api 
> will be changed for releases
>       The PPB needs to be notified for API version changes
> 
> Openstack V1.1
>       Improve the JSON/XML conversion code (Team Titan is proposing something 
> for this)
>       AffinityID is going to stay as an extension for now
>       Focus on finishing the few remaining parts of the 1.1 spec
> 
> Testing
>       Goal 95% unit test coverage by Diablo
>       Implement Tarmac rule for not lowering unittest percentage
>       Policy not to accept merge proposals without feature testing
>       Policy to require failing test for bug fixes
>       Documentation and examples for unit testing (email requesting help 
> forthcoming) (*)
> 
> Automated Testing (*)
>       Monty will be leading this effort
>       Unite the various smoketesting / functional testing frameworks
>       Goal to have simple version of jenkins integration in two weeks
>       More robust automation and branch testing by Milestone 1
> 
> Move to Git
>       Project management tools will stay at launchpad
>       Code and merge proposals to be moved completely by Milestone 2 (*)
>       Bugs will stay at lauchpad for now, but we will investigate using 
> issues in the future
> 
> Utility VMs
>       This is dependent on multinic and host/guest communication
>       Common method for Provider controlled VMs needs to be defined
> 
> Block Storage as a Service (LunR)
>       Nova needs to add full REST api to volume code (*)
>       Nova should use rest APIs for communicating with volumes (*)
>       This will allow other services like LunR to be plugged in easily
> 
> Host/Guest Communication
>       Move metadata server from api to compute (*)
>       Prototype a unique nic for backchannel communication (*)
> 
> High Availability
>       NTT has instructions for failover using HA-Linux for nova-network
>       Create recovery strategy for error cases (*)
>       
> Improve RPC
>       Send complete data in messages instead of using DB
>       Add timeouts to rpc.call to support handling errors (*)
> 
> Network as a Service
>       Leaving security groups in nova for the moment
>       We will investigate whether to pull out nova code or supply an extra 
> manager for new functionality (*)
>       network-service created on launchpad to hold new projects
> 
> Resource UUIDs
>       We will convert all of the resources to use UUIDs instead of integer 
> ids (*)
>       We will supply a mapping layer for ec2 compatibility that will map ec2 
> ids to UUIDS (*)
> 
> Code Quality
>       No clear decision on object model vs. dictionary
>       Justin provided prototype of full-featured object approach
>       A proposal is to to use existing code with better tests (*) Termie
>       Another proposal is for lightweight objects (*) Vish
> 
> Auth Service
>       Will be developed in quick iterations
>       Nova will start with two simple shims (auto-create users and projects) 
> and (ec2 to auth token) (*)
>       Shims will be removed as auth gains the necessary features
>       Concerns about AuthZ and zones will be pushed until after the basic 
> integration is done
>       
>  
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> Post to     : [email protected]
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to     : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to