On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 8:45 PM, Soren Hansen <so...@linux2go.dk> wrote:
> 2011/6/7 Andy Smith <andys...@gmail.com>: > > At the moment the two closest things to being "official" installations > for > > us (me? are the chef recipes and the nova.sh script (the nova.sh script > > obviously being only targeted at testing and dev though), those are what > we > > use to verify that the system is functional and I think we'd like to use > > chef or puppet for baremetal deployments as well. > > TL;DR: Can we focus on the chef recipes instead of on .debs? > > I must have missed a memo at some point. Really. > No memo, just what we've been using for lack (or ignorance) of an alternative that allows us to adequately deploy and configure a system quickly, and they are what we run our own continuous builds and smoketests against for existing deployments. We're at the same place as everybody else, we want better CI support, to stop duplicating work and to have an easy-as-eating-pie tool for deployment, so don't take the word "official" to mean we're putting any words in your mouth, it was in quotes for a reason. > > -- > Soren Hansen | http://linux2go.dk/ > Ubuntu Developer | http://www.ubuntu.com/ > OpenStack Developer | http://www.openstack.org/ >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp