2011/9/7 Sandy Walsh <sandy.wa...@rackspace.com>: > We're talking simple string parsing here. The last keyword from a user is > that users vote. Multiple pull requests would be equally easy to support with > a !new_vote command (or some such thing).
The critical point has never been whether we could reliably detect people's votes (even though I really dislike parsing free-form text to extract critical information like this). Even though Launchpad offers voting information in a structured manner, we *intentionally* don't auto-approve things there as soon as they have +2. Sometimes there are simply reasons why things shouldn't get merged even though they have two approves. If there's already one +1, but someone specific (someone with domain specific knowledge, a release team member, etc) needs to sign off on it as well, I still want to be able to say that I've reviewed it and approve of it, without causing it to get merged. We also want to be able to review features and vote on them even during freeze times without causing them to get merged. -- Soren Hansen | http://linux2go.dk/ Ubuntu Developer | http://www.ubuntu.com/ OpenStack Developer | http://www.openstack.org/ _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp