On Sep 12, 2011, at 3:16 PM, Gabe Westmaas wrote:
>> It would be advantageous for the tests to only use one client, whatever
>> it turns out to be. I think it would be most practical to use a bleeding
>> edge version of Nova client and add any features necessary to it in its
>> own repo directly or by somehow mixing it in with the test code.
>
> My biggest concern in using novaclient exclusively is masking errors in
> both the API and novaclient. If this is resolved another way, then I'm
> ok.
There were many who wanted to separate the two functions: inter-zone
communication would use a highly specialized, internally-sourced client, while
'novaclient' would be an independent project managed outside of OpenStack, and
would serve as to keep the API honest. While this would cause some duplication,
the trade-off in cleanliness might be worth it.
-- Ed Leafe
This email may include confidential information. If you received it in error,
please delete it.
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
