On 20 October 2011 08:45, Thierry Carrez <thie...@openstack.org> wrote: > James Bailey wrote: >> On 19 October 2011 16:29, Russell Bryant <rbry...@redhat.com> wrote: >>> Hopefully it works out! I love FOSDEM. >>> >>> One thing that might help the application is to note that you're willing to >>> increase the scope of the devroom if needed. Preference is given to >>> requests that cover a domain that includes multiple projects as opposed to >>> requests for a single project. So, for example, you could request an >>> OpenStack devroom, but note that you'd also be willing to expand it to cover >>> something like "Cloud Infrastructure", and invite other related projects to >>> participate as well if you can't have just an OpenStack room. >> >> This would be something I would be very interested in. >> >> last year the Devops room was run pretty much by Puppet labs but they >> covered Chef/Vagrant, Cfengine, Foreman, Gepetto even some Windows. >> You could cover the core projects Nova, Swift, Glance and Keystone, >> then open it up to people like Dell with Barclamp, maybe some of the >> Storage back end folk getting involved now like Ceph or Nexenta might >> be interested. I am sure others I can not think of are also >> interested. > > That's very good feedback, thanks ! > > I will make sure to include that in the application.
Further the Fosdem conversation, Jochen Maes @sejo_it one of the Fosdem core team is tweeting about wanting more main track proposals, I think Openstack should be cheeky and apply, if only so I don't have to camp out for space in the dev room. ;) It would be nice if who ever in the community is organising this to post some updates as time goes on. Jim :) _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
