Thanks a lot for your answers. Unfortunately I can't follow the trunk
and I have to use the Diablo release. Is it possible to backport that
new scheduler to Diablo?
Anyway I gave the least cost scheduler a try, it loads but never
schedules a vm correctly.

--compute_scheduler_driver=nova.scheduler.least_cost.LeastCostScheduler

But then log fires that message when I try to launch an instance

2011-11-10 19:31:15,588 DEBUG nova.scheduler.least_cost [-] Weighted
Costs => [] from (pid=1697) weigh_hosts
/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.7/nova/scheduler/least_cost.py:170
2011-11-10 19:31:15,591 ERROR nova.rpc [-] Exception during message handling
(nova.rpc): TRACE: Traceback (most recent call last):
(nova.rpc): TRACE:   File
"/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.7/nova/rpc/impl_kombu.py", line 620, in
_process_data
(nova.rpc): TRACE:     rval = node_func(context=ctxt, **node_args)
(nova.rpc): TRACE:   File
"/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.7/nova/scheduler/manager.py", line 103, in
_schedule
(nova.rpc): TRACE:     host = real_meth(*args, **kwargs)
(nova.rpc): TRACE:   File
"/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.7/nova/scheduler/abstract_scheduler.py",
line 231, in schedule_run_instance
(nova.rpc): TRACE:     raise driver.NoValidHost(_('No hosts were available'))
(nova.rpc): TRACE: NoValidHost: No hosts were available
(nova.rpc): TRACE:

My compute hosts are up and running, and there are no other instances running.

root@unic-dev-os-controller:~# nova-manage service list
Binary           Host                                 Zone
Status     State Updated_At
nova-compute     unic-dev-os-controller               nova
enabled    :-)   2011-11-10 18:35:06
nova-scheduler   unic-dev-os-controller               nova
enabled    :-)   2011-11-10 18:35:06
nova-network     unic-dev-os-controller               nova
enabled    :-)   2011-11-10 18:35:06
nova-compute     unic-dev-os-compute1                 nova
enabled    :-)   2011-11-10 18:35:06

Any ideas why the scheduler does not find a valid host?

Christian

2011/11/1 Lorin Hochstein <lo...@isi.edu>:
> Christian:
>
> Sandy's branch just landed in the repository. You should be able to use the 
> distributed scheduler with the least cost functionality by specifying the 
> following flag in nova.conf for the nova-scheduler service:
>
> --compute_scheduler_driver=nova.scheduler.distributed_scheduler.DistributedScheduler
>
> By default, this uses the 
> nova.scheduler.least_cost.compute_fill_first_cost_fn weighting function.
>
> Note, however, that this function will favor scheduling instances to nodes 
> that have the smallest amount of RAM available that can still fit the 
> instance. If you're looking for the opposite effect (deploy to the node that 
> has the most amount of RAM free), then you'll have to write your own cost 
> function.  One way would be to add the following method to least_cost.py:
>
>
> def compute_least_loaded_cost_fn(host_info):
>    return -compute_fill_first_cost_fn(host_info)
>
>
> Then add the following flag to your nova.conf
>
> --least_cost_functions=nova.scheduler.least_cost.compute_least_loaded_cost_fn
>
>
> Lorin
> --
> Lorin Hochstein, Computer Scientist
> USC Information Sciences Institute
> 703.812.3710
> http://www.east.isi.edu/~lorin
>
>
>
>
> On Nov 1, 2011, at 11:37 AM, Sandy Walsh wrote:
>
>> I'm hoping to land this branch asap.
>> https://review.openstack.org/#change,1192
>>
>> It replaces all the "kind of alike" schedulers with a single 
>> DistributedScheduler.
>>
>> -S
>>
>> ________________________________________
>> From: openstack-bounces+sandy.walsh=rackspace....@lists.launchpad.net 
>> [openstack-bounces+sandy.walsh=rackspace....@lists.launchpad.net] on behalf 
>> of Christian Wittwer [wittwe...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2011 5:38 AM
>> To: Lorin Hochstein
>> Cc: openstack@lists.launchpad.net
>> Subject: Re: [Openstack] Which nova scheduler for different hardware sizes?
>>
>> Lorin,
>> Thanks for your reply. Well the least cost scheduler with these cost
>> functions looks interesting.
>> Unfortunately there is not much documenation about it. Can somebody
>> give me an example how to switch to that scheduler using the memory
>> cost function which already exist?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Christian
>>
>> 2011/10/24 Lorin Hochstein <lo...@isi.edu>:
>>> Christian:
>>> You could use the least cost scheduler, but I think you'd have to write your
>>> own cost function to take into account the different number of cores.
>>> Looking at the source, the only cost function it comes with only takes into
>>> account the amount of memory that's free, not loading in terms of total
>>> physical cores and allocated virtual cores. (We use a custom scheduler at
>>> our site, so I don't have any firsthand experience with the least-cost
>>> scheduler).
>>> Lorin
>>> --
>>> Lorin Hochstein, Computer Scientist
>>> USC Information Sciences Institute
>>> 703.812.3710
>>> http://www.east.isi.edu/~lorin
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Oct 22, 2011, at 3:17 AM, Christian Wittwer wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm planning to build a openstack nova installation with older
>>> hardware. These servers obviously doesn't have the same hardware
>>> configuration like memory and cores.
>>> It ranges from 2 core and 4GB memory to 16 core and 64GB memory. I
>>> know that there are different scheduler, but I'm not sure which one to
>>> choose.
>>> The simple scheduler tries to find the least used host, but the amount
>>> of used cores per host (max_cores) is a constant, which doesn't work
>>> for me.
>>> Maybe the least cost scheduler would be the right one? But I'm not
>>> sure, because I did not find any documenation about how to use it.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Christian
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
>>> Post to     : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
>>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
>>> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
>> Post to     : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
>> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>

_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to     : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to