> On Friday, March 9, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Thor Wolpert wrote:
>
>> I thought a Foundation that paid for legal, marketing and core
>> services; along with a hosted set of projects whose membership was
>> based upon meritocracy was the model.
That is and always has been the plan and can be seen in the existing detailed
structure proposal: http://wiki.openstack.org/Governance/Foundation/Structure
I think Josh is really focusing more on the details of membership on the Board,
which is separate from the the governance and membership of the projects.
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp