On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 3:50 AM, Loic Dachary <l...@enovance.com> wrote:
> On 05/12/2012 01:30 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > > > On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 5:27 PM, Loic Dachary <l...@enovance.com> wrote: > >> On 05/11/2012 10:01 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: >> > I was very surprised to see the change to license ceilometer as AGPL >> [1]. Why are we not using the same Apache v2 license that all other >> OpenStack projects are using? >> > >> > Doug >> > >> > [1] https://review.stackforge.org/#/c/29/ >> > >> > >> Hi, >> >> Of course it will be Apache v2 when it is incubated, otherwise it will be >> rejected. eNovance policy is to publish server side code under AGPLv3+, >> hence the change. This should have been discussed before though. If this >> raises any issues please let me know and I'll make sure they are resolved. >> > > As I pointed out privately, it seems like it will be easier to start > with the license we know we will need later than to change the license > after we have a bunch of contributions. I appreciate the rationale behind a > "default to copyleft" policy, but the community already has a standard for > licensing and that should take precedence here. > > This is reasonable indeed and we will publish all code to ceilometer > under Apache from now on. Thanks for raising this issue. > Good, thank you! Doug
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp