On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Thierry Carrez <thie...@openstack.org> wrote: > I expect the packaging teams in each distro to consider which plugins > make the most sense and package them.
+1, this is totally up to the distro to takes care of those things. Talking about packaging and middlewares, it would be nice if the packagers could do a split of the middlewares from a main project. For example in keystone the auth_token middleware is located in the python-keystone package for Ubuntu[1] it would be much nicer if this is splitted to its own package like python-keystone-auth-token and avoid end-user confusion like "why do I need to install the full keystone[2] to get Nova/Swift/Glance+KeystoneAuth working" I am not sure what's the process to get this forward, should I just report a bug against Fedora/Ubuntu package and attach a patch for the .spec, debian/control in there ? Thanks, Chmouel. [1] and seems to be the case as well for RedHat according to http://is.gd/MGMAZ1 [2] on the same server. _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
