That's what I was worried about, and why I (just my opinion) think that we need 
to be a lot stricter about vetting new dependencies.

There needs to be time given to say, ensuring that its really needed, if it 
really is, documenting why it has to be there in depth, getting various PTL's 
to agree on that, then comes the process of informing and/or discussing with 
the distributions about how to get that supported (if it isn't). That second 
stage might influence the first and so on.

Since problems like this, although yes, it slows down development overall, seem 
necessary in a larger project with multiple distributions being enabled (for 
development usage and for actual prod. usage).

On 5/24/12 3:38 PM, "Russell Bryant" <rbry...@redhat.com> wrote:

On 05/24/2012 03:40 PM, Devin Carlen wrote:
> Hi Joshua,
>
> Node.js is in the standard repos for most modern distros.  It's not an
> issue for Ubuntu/Fedora.

It actually is a problem for Fedora.  node.js is not in Fedora.  Once
Horizon requires node.js, it will be broken for Fedora (and EPEL for use
with RHEL and its derivatives).

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=815018

--
Russell Bryant

_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to     : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to