---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Monty Taylor <[email protected]> Date: Tue, May 29, 2012 at 11:24 AM Subject: Re: administration of new mailinglists To: Stefano Maffulli <[email protected]> Cc: Thierry Carrez <[email protected]>, Duncan McGreggor <[email protected]>, Michael Tietz <[email protected]>, Christian Berendt <[email protected]>, "James E. Blair" <[email protected]>
On 05/29/2012 11:13 AM, Stefano Maffulli wrote: > On 05/26/2012 11:38 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: >> That's a valid point (my point was about the topic of the list, not so >> much about its location). I'm not really attached to the LP setup, it's >> more a question of disruption for our existing users, but the benefit >> might be worth it. > > I don't think there is an easy way to migrate over 2000 users from one > place to another but I also think that we should have one place for all > the lists, ideally. > > Moving those subscribers will not be an easy task, so I would consider > that a project in itself. We should move this discussion to the public list. > >> That said, I still think there is value in a "default" discussion list, >> separate from the development list. I guess we could have: >> >> [email protected] - default discussion about openstack - present-looking >> [email protected] - development discussions - forward-looking >> [email protected] - "operators" (??) > > I like this setup, so we don't have to change names/addresses. We can > keep openstack@ on LP until we have the new l.o.o up and running. > Migrating will be complicate. > >> We would rename "operators" to "users" and encourage current subscribers >> to join it. > > I don't see the value in renaming the list. Why would you want to create > this pain for the current subscribers? > >> Two questions: how do you merge the old archives with the operators >> archive ? > > which old archives? > >> And for "announce": who gets the right to post to it ? Or >> rather, who gets to moderate the posts to it ? PPB ? PTL/relmgr ? Any >> volunteer ? > > You'll have to work very hard to convince me that an announce list is > worth the trouble :) 'Tradition' is not a good argument. > > First of all, it's not clear to me *who* would need to send out > announcements. Can somebody start from there? > > I'll start enumerating why I don't think such list is needed by > community managers: > > - more lists, more policies, more complexity for newcomers, things that > they need to learn. > - more lists, more policies, more complexity to manage (moderators, spam > masters, etc) > - the announce list has not been used for over 8 months, nobody noticed > - multiplying contact points for people increases the need for > cross-posting, more messages > - an announce is fundamentally a one-way communication, no need to have > 'discussions' around it, mailing list is the wrong tool *today* (it made > sense in the 90s) > - an announce sent to a mailman list is fundamentally shouting in the > wind: there might be people listening, you'll never know if they heard > something. A *segmented* (developers, operators, business folks) > newsletter is the best way to send out announcements. I agree with this about the announce list. Announcements these days are usually done via some combination of blog/rss/twitter. _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
