Hi Maru,

whether plugins should be packaged or not with the main quantum service is
a "recurrent" question on this mailing list - and I am afraid I don't have
answer to it!
Pro and cons of separating the plugins from the main repository have been
discussed on the mailing list and on the IRC channels; I hope some final
deciscion/action will be agreed at the next Openstack summit. However, so
far nothing has been done in this direction.

As concerns testing, our goal is to ensure that plugins too are covered by
unit tests just like the quantum service. This can be achieved in two ways:
1) moving all tests in the same tree, so that  a single tox run can run
them all, or
2) modifying the unit testing script on the openstack jenkins to run tox in
the main tests directory and into each plugin's test dir.

The approach I am following so far is the first, which seem consistent with
what nova does for its virt drivers; however if we (and the openstack-ci
team) believe we should do it differently, we could have a tox.ini and a
test-requires into each plugin folder, and execute a tox run for each
plugin (plus a tox run for the quantum service)

Salvatore


On 24 August 2012 17:35, Maru Newby <mne...@internap.com> wrote:

> Hi Salvatore,
>
> I see you're working on getting plugins testable with tox:
>
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/11922/
>
> What about keeping the plugins isolated for testing purposes?  I have been
> unable to work on it yet, but I was thinking it might be a good idea to
> move the plugins out of the main tree (but still in the same repo) for ease
> of maintenance, testing and deployment.  The thought was:
>
> - relocate all plugins outside of main quantum tree (plugins/ dir in the
> repo root)
> - give each plugin
>   - its own python root-level package (e.g. quantum_ovs)
>   - its own tox.ini
>   - its own tools/*-requires
>
> So the layout would be something like:
>
> plugins/quantum_ovs/tox.ini
> plugins/quantum_ovs/quantum_ovs/__init__.py
> plugins/quantum_ovs/tests/__init__.py
> plugins/quanum_ovs/tools/pip-requires
> ....
> plugins/quantum_linuxbridge/tox.ini
> ...
>
> The tests for each plugin could then be executed via an independent tox
> run.
>
> Is there any merit to this, now or in the future?
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> Maru
>
> On 2012-08-24, at 2:56 PM, Salvatore Orlando (Code Review) wrote:
>
> > Salvatore Orlando has uploaded a new change for review.
> >
> > Change subject: Enable tox to run OVS plugin unit tests
> > ......................................................................
> >
> > Enable tox to run OVS plugin unit tests
> >
> > Fix bug 1029142
> >
> > Unit tests have been moved into /quantum/tests/unit
> >
> > Change-Id: I5d0fa84826f62a86e4ab04c3e1958869f24a1fcf
> > ---
> > D quantum/plugins/openvswitch/run_tests.py
> > D quantum/plugins/openvswitch/tests/__init__.py
> > D quantum/plugins/openvswitch/tests/unit/__init__.py
> > R quantum/tests/unit/test_ovs_db.py
> > R quantum/tests/unit/test_ovs_defaults.py
> > R quantum/tests/unit/test_ovs_rpcapi.py
> > R quantum/tests/unit/test_ovs_tunnel.py
> > 7 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 72 deletions(-)
> >
> >
> >  git pull 
> > ssh://review.openstack.org:29418/openstack/quantumrefs/changes/22/11922/1
> > --
> > To view, visit https://review.openstack.org/11922
> > To unsubscribe, visit https://review.openstack.org/settings
> >
> > Gerrit-MessageType: newchange
> > Gerrit-Change-Id: I5d0fa84826f62a86e4ab04c3e1958869f24a1fcf
> > Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
> > Gerrit-Project: openstack/quantum
> > Gerrit-Branch: master
> > Gerrit-Owner: Salvatore Orlando <salv.orla...@gmail.com>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> Post to     : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to     : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to