My question is what does this extra dependancy give us apart from extra complexity?
I can't see any enhancement in security with this method? Cheers, Sam On 13/12/2012, at 4:44 AM, Ken Thomas <[email protected]> wrote: > Greetings all! > > I'm look into using keyring as a way to (optionally) remove clear text > passwords from the various config files. (See > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/oslo/+spec/pw-keyrings for details.) > > One of the comments I got back is that I should have the oslo build > dependency on keyring be optional until a consensus is reached that it's okay > to add it. I see that keystoneclient is already doing an "import keyring" > and catching the exception if it's not there. I can certainly do something > similar, but it seems like it would simplify things if we did just have > keyring as a regular hard dependency. You don't have to use it, but it's > there if you want it. > > So, is this the proper forum to bring this up? > > And if so, can we start the ball rolling to get a decision on getting that > dependency approved? > > Thanks, > > Ken > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
