Absolutely. The main difference is that Savanna is the Hadoop oriented service. It aims to provide unified user-friendly API that will allow users to deploy Hadoop clusters fastly and without additional configurations for cluster provisioning.
Sergey Lukjanov On Apr 11, 2013, at 20:21, Lloyd Dewolf <lloydost...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Robert Collins > <robe...@robertcollins.net> wrote: >> >> On 11 April 2013 08:30, Sergey Lukjanov <slukja...@mirantis.com> wrote: >>> Hi everybody, >>> >>> we finished Phase 1 of our roadmap and released the first project release! >>> >>> Currently Savanna has the REST API for Hadoop cluster provisioning using >>> pre-installed images and we started working on pluggable mechanism for >>> custom cluster provisioning tools. >>> >>> Also I'd like to note that custom pages for OpenStack Dashbord have been >>> published too. >>> >>> You can find more info on Savanna site: >> >> Savanna seems to fit into the same space as Heat (going off your >> diagram on http://savanna.mirantis.com/) - can you explain how it is >> different? > > > My understanding of Savanna is it's complete focus on Hadoop. > > Monty also recently asked about the opportunity for Savanna to use > Heat in a thread titled "Re: [openstack-dev] [EHO] Project name change > [Savanna]" > http://markmail.org/message/2vre6r4kgwqhvhav > > Hope that helps, > Lloyd > > -- > @lloyddewolf > http://www.pistoncloud.com/ _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
