On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Mark Brown <ntdeveloper2...@yahoo.com>wrote:
> It definitely would be something useful. Dont know why it is not already > implemented. > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Swapnil Kulkarni <swapnilkulkarni2...@gmail.com> > *To:* Razique Mahroua <razique.mahr...@gmail.com> > *Cc:* Openstack Openstack <openstack@lists.openstack.org> > *Sent:* Wednesday, September 4, 2013 2:44 AM > *Subject:* Re: [Openstack] Cinder question > > Guys, > > > You might want to have a look at > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cinder/+spec/multi-attach-volume > > Its already proposed > > Best Regards, > Swapnil Kulkarni > swapnilkulkarni2...@gmail.com > +91-87960 10622(c) > http://in.linkedin.com/in/coolsvap > > > > On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 2:24 PM, Razique Mahroua <razique.mahr...@gmail.com > > wrote: > > It doesn't necessarily uses iscsi, > but yes I definitely agree man ! > > Le 4 sept. 2013 à 10:37, Martinx - ジェームズ <thiagocmarti...@gmail.com> a > écrit : > > This is a must!! It would be great to attach 1 volume, to multiple > instances!! > Sounds pretty basic, since it uses iSCSI, there is no reason to not allow > this... > > Cheers! > Thiago > > > On 3 September 2013 20:25, Mark Brown <ntdeveloper2...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > Hello, > I had a Cinder question, and maybe its pretty basic:-) > > Isn't there a way to attach the same Cinder volume to two different VMs, > whether same physical server or different? I don't mean across different > data centers, but any domain (zone, or whatever) within the same data > center? > > Thanks. > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack > Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org > Unsubscribe : > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack > > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack > Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org > Unsubscribe : > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack > > > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack > Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org > Unsubscribe : > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack > > > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack > Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org > Unsubscribe : > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack > > > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack > Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org > Unsubscribe : > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack > > Very useful, and we had hoped to have had it for H but there are a number of folks that have concerns so it's getting further analysis for I.
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
