On 3/31/2014 12:48 PM, Florian Chazal wrote:
Hi Matt,

Regarding your answer the driver seems to handle VLAN mode but I still
don't see how it can without a specific neutron plugin. From what I see
from the code there is no any call for IVM "mkdev -vlan" and "-tagid"
parameters.

Should I extend it myself or am I missing something ?

Regards,

Florian CHAZAL




On 21 March 2014 18:52, Matt Riedemann <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:



    On 3/21/2014 6:45 PM, Florian Chazal wrote:

        Hi All,

        Better late that never:

        Since few weeks we are testing IBM Power System R2 server and we
        were
        evaluating the capability to go on a larger scale.  We are
        lacking of
        information regarding PowerKVM status and PowerVC so we began to try
        Havana + powerVM:
        The launch of a VM went well (except an issue with glance which
        does not
        gzip the image ... troubleshoot in process) but how does it works
        regarding the network ? What type of network configuration it
        has been
        tested with ?

        Thank you in advance,

        Florian CHAZAL


        On 25 November 2013 08:26, Matt Riedemann
        <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
        <mailto:[email protected].__ibm.com
        <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote:



             On Monday, November 25, 2013 10:14:00 AM, Anne Gentle wrote:




                 On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 5:10 AM, Thierry Carrez
                 <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
        <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
                 <mailto:[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>>__>__>

                 wrote:

                      Chuck Short wrote:
                      > On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Michael Still
                      <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
        <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
                 <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
        <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>>
                      > <mailto:[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>>
                 <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
        <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>>>> wrote:
                      >
                      >>     So, a few questions...
                      >>
                      >>      - If there are no users shall we remove it
        from
                 Havana and
                      Grizzly as
                      >>     well, or does that violate our stability
        principles
                 too much?
                      >
                      >
                      > Speaking with my stable maintainers hat on I
        would personally
                      NACK this
                      > since
                      > it doesnt meet the standard of a stable maintenance
                 requirement,
                      imho.

                      It definitely doesn't meet our stable maintenance
        rules. We
                 want
                      people
                      to be able to safely upgrade to the latest
        stable/* when
                 they are
                      users
                      of the release. We don't add new features,
        removing them
                 would be even
                      worse.

                      >>      - If we don't remove the code from stable,
        what about
                      removing all
                      >>     references from the stable docs and putting
        in a warning
                      saying that
                      >>     powervm is a dead end instead? I want to
        minimise
                 confusion
                      on the
                      >>     part of people deploying stable releases.
                      >
                      > This would be okay in my opinion.

                      At the very minimum I would add the "dead-end"
        comment to
                 the Havana
                      release notes. If Anne is fine by it, it could also be
                 added to the
                      stable/havana version of the docs.


                 PowerVM was mostly documented in developer docs in the
        nova repo. It
                 also has entries in the Configuration Reference in the
        nova.conf
                 options tables from our autodoc process. Those will
        just stay in the
                 stable/havana repo, but I'm okay with backporting a note to
                 stable/havana with a clear message as to the driver's
        fate. We also
                 have a mention of PowerVM in stable/grizzly where we
        could also
                 place
                 a note. Release notes are a good place for this as
        well, thanks
                 Russell.

                 Tracking with
        https://bugs.launchpad.net/____openstack-manuals/+bug/1254780
        <https://bugs.launchpad.net/__openstack-manuals/+bug/1254780>


        <https://bugs.launchpad.net/__openstack-manuals/+bug/1254780
        <https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-manuals/+bug/1254780>__> --
                 feel free
                 to add the nova project as well to ensure the docs in
        the nova repo
                 are removed.

                 I do want to point out that we don't have adequate
        documentation of
                 other drivers, like Hyper-V and Xen, just want to make
        sure you all
                 know there are gaps and documentation isn't the
        indicator of
                 "acceptance" of a hypervisor driver.
                 Thanks -
                 Anne

                      --
                      Thierry Carrez (ttx)

                      ___________________________________________________
                      Mailing list:
        http://lists.openstack.org/____cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/____openstack
        <http://lists.openstack.org/__cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/__openstack>
        <http://lists.openstack.org/__cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/__openstack
        <http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack>>

                      Post to     : [email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>
                 <mailto:openstack@lists.__openstack.org
        <mailto:[email protected]>>
                      <mailto:openstack@lists.
        <mailto:openstack@lists.>__open__stack.org <http://openstack.org>
                 <mailto:openstack@lists.__openstack.org
        <mailto:[email protected]>>>
                      Unsubscribe :
        http://lists.openstack.org/____cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/____openstack
        <http://lists.openstack.org/__cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/__openstack>
        <http://lists.openstack.org/__cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/__openstack
        <http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack>>





                 ___________________________________________________
                 Mailing list:
        http://lists.openstack.org/____cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/____openstack
        <http://lists.openstack.org/__cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/__openstack>
        <http://lists.openstack.org/__cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/__openstack
        <http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack>>

                 Post to     : [email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>
                 <mailto:openstack@lists.__openstack.org
        <mailto:[email protected]>>
                 Unsubscribe :
        http://lists.openstack.org/____cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/____openstack
        <http://lists.openstack.org/__cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/__openstack>
        <http://lists.openstack.org/__cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/__openstack
        <http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack>>



             Also to relay what was discussed in nova IRC this morning, this
             topic is on the release meeting agenda for tomorrow:

        
https://wiki.openstack.org/____wiki/Meetings/ProjectMeeting#____Agenda_for_next_meeting
        
<https://wiki.openstack.org/__wiki/Meetings/ProjectMeeting#__Agenda_for_next_meeting>


        
<https://wiki.openstack.org/__wiki/Meetings/ProjectMeeting#__Agenda_for_next_meeting
        
<https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/ProjectMeeting#Agenda_for_next_meeting>>

             --

             Thanks,

             Matt Riedemann



             ___________________________________________________
             Mailing list:
        http://lists.openstack.org/____cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/____openstack
        <http://lists.openstack.org/__cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/__openstack>


        <http://lists.openstack.org/__cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/__openstack
        <http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack>>
             Post to     : [email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>
             <mailto:openstack@lists.__openstack.org
        <mailto:[email protected]>>
             Unsubscribe :
        http://lists.openstack.org/____cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/____openstack
        <http://lists.openstack.org/__cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/__openstack>


        <http://lists.openstack.org/__cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/__openstack
        <http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack>>




        --
        Florian Chazal


    Hi Florian,

    Some details on what testing we did internally with running Tempest:

    - Controller/Compute Node: RHEL 6.3-6.5, Fedora 19 ppc64
    - Hypervisor: PowerVM IVM 2.2.2.0+
    - Platform: P7 and P7+ Racks, Blades, ITEs
    - Networking:
             - Neutron + Open vSwitch: Flat, VLAN - IPv4 only
             - nova-network: Flat
    - Cinder Storage Driver: Storwize/SVC 6.4.1/6.4.2 for FC

    There are some teams here working on getting a PowerVC nova virt
    driver into Stackforge.

    --

    Thanks,

    Matt Riedemann




--
Florian Chazal

Hi Florian,

Looks like you're right, VLAN isn't supported in the PowerVM driver, only flat networking. I was looking at some incorrect support charts which must have meant PowerVC instead of PowerVM.

By the way, I'm not sure if you've seen this but if you're looking for config drive support there is a patch here [1] that was being worked for Icehouse but was abandoned due to the driver being removed from nova upstream. It went through decent review and was run internally for a couple of releases so it should be relatively stable.

[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/38716/

--

Thanks,

Matt Riedemann


_______________________________________________
Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
Post to     : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack

Reply via email to