Thanks so much everyone for the insights. As we move the costs analysis, seems at a glance that amazon S3 is more than double expensive than having swift (at least for our use case, tha transfer fees is where swift makes the difference) i'll try to share some data along the way.
Thanks so much to all the community. Alejandro Comisario *MercadoLibre Cloud Services* Arias 3751, Piso 7 (C1430CRG) Ciudad de Buenos Aires - Argentina Cel: +549(11) 15-3770-1857 Tel : +54(11) 4640-8443 On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 8:28 PM, Adam Lawson <alaw...@aqorn.com> wrote: > Since AWS defines cost per GB in terms of consumable storage, I *think*that > would be 10TB usable, not raw. Just a quick swag given the specs above > assume 10-12x2TB HDD per storage node. > > > *Adam Lawson* > AQORN, Inc. > 427 North Tatnall Street > Ste. 58461 > Wilmington, Delaware 19801-2230 > Toll-free: (844) 4-AQORN-NOW > Direct: +1 (302) 268-6914 > > > > On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 3:19 PM, gustavo panizzo <gfa> > <g...@zumbi.com.ar>wrote: > >> On 04/30/2014 04:54 PM, Adam Lawson wrote: >> > Basically, a 10TB cluster, >> >> 10TB raw or usable? >> >> thx! >> >> >> >> -- >> 1AE0 322E B8F7 4717 BDEA BF1D 44BB 1BA7 9F6C 6333 >> > >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
