Jeremy Stanley <fu...@yuggoth.org> writes: > On 2014-08-21 15:11:13 -0700 (-0700), James E. Blair wrote: > [...] >> Strictly speaking, that will mean that every patchset will go through >> the merger and Jenkins. But if testing for a patchset is in progress >> when a new patchset is uploaded, the tests will abort. > [...] > > One corner case I think we've seen which could lead to confusion is > that once a job enters the Gearman queue it doesn't get removed even > if Zuul removes it from the pipeline... so if your worker volume is > backed up enough that some jobs for a patchset haven't been assigned > before another patchset causes the current one to get dequeued, > Jenkins can end up running those jobs anyway. > > Did we ever end up implementing a solution for that, or does that > behavior still exist?
Jobs in the Gearman queue are definitely supposed to be canceled; if not, that's a bug (and not a known one). -Jim _______________________________________________ Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
