Dear Volodymyr, Benjamin,
thanks a lot for your tipps and patience ... but still facing the same
problem :/
So I need to bother you again ...
I think its something totally stupid, basic I do wrong ...
Let me summarize what I did so far:
- Update OpenStack to pike (devstack All in Single VM using default
local.conf)
[following this https://docs.openstack.org/devstack/latest/index.html]
- Set prevent_arp_spoofing = False in ml2_config.ini
- Disable Port Security of the TestNFV
+-----------------------+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Field | Value |
+-----------------------+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| admin_state_up | UP |
| allowed_address_pairs | |
| binding_host_id | None |
| binding_profile | None |
| binding_vif_details | None |
| binding_vif_type | None |
| binding_vnic_type | normal |
| created_at | 2018-01-31T07:50:40Z
|
| data_plane_status | None |
| description | |
| device_id | 97101c9b-c5ea-47f5-aa50-4a6ffa06c2a2
|
| device_owner | compute:nova |
| dns_assignment | None |
| dns_name | None |
| extra_dhcp_opts | |
| fixed_ips | ip_address='192.168.120.5',
subnet_id='b88f21e0-55ce-482f-8755-87a431f43e52' |
| id | 5e97ea14-2555-44fc-bbfa-61877e93ae69
|
| ip_address | None |
| mac_address | fa:16:3e:55:80:84
|
| name | |
| network_id | 67572da9-c1e1-4330-84f6-79b64225c070
|
| option_name | None |
| option_value | None |
| port_security_enabled | False |
| project_id | ec8680e914a540e59d9d84dec8101ba5
|
| qos_policy_id | None |
| revision_number | 56 |
| security_group_ids | |
| status | ACTIVE |
| subnet_id | None |
| tags | |
| trunk_details | None |
| updated_at | 2018-02-02T13:40:26Z
|
+-----------------------+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
In this state everything works fine and as expected ... I can ping
from VM1 (192.168.120.10) to Test NVF VM (192.168.120.5) and get a
response ... I have access to the outside world ...
BUT
As soon as I bring the OVS up inside of the Test NVF ... now as
Volodymyr proposed with a "special patch port"
Database config:
59aca356-8f37-4c6f-8c9a-504c66c65648
Bridge "OVSbr2"
Controller "tcp:192.168.53.49:6633"
is_connected: true
fail_mode: secure
Port "OVSbr2-patch"
Interface "OVSbr2-patch"
type: patch
options: {peer="OVSbr1-patch"}
Port "OVSbr2"
Interface "OVSbr2"
type: internal
Port "ens5"
Interface "ens5"
Bridge "OVSbr1"
Controller "tcp:192.168.53.49:6633"
is_connected: true
fail_mode: secure
Port "OVSbr1"
Interface "OVSbr1"
type: internal
Port "OVSbr1-patch"
Interface "OVSbr1-patch"
type: patch
options: {peer="OVSbr2-patch"}
Port "ens4"
Interface "ens4"
ovs_version: "2.5.2"
the ping stops ... and again with tcpdump I can only see ARP requests
on ens4 but not on the OVSbr1 bridge ...
But I see now some LLDP packets on the ens4 and OVSbr1 ....
Then I tried following ... I stopped the ping from source to TestNFVVM
And start pinging from the TestNFV (192.168.120.5) to the Source
(192.168.120.10)
Again I didnt get any response ...
And again looked at the tcpdump of OVSbr1 and ens4 ...
tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol
decode
listening on OVSbr1, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 262144
bytes
13:59:18.245528 IP 192.168.120.5 > 192.168.120.10: ICMP echo request,
id 1839, seq 286, length 64
13:59:19.253513 IP 192.168.120.5 > 192.168.120.10: ICMP echo request,
id 1839, seq 287, length 64
13:59:20.261487 IP 192.168.120.5 > 192.168.120.10: ICMP echo request,
id 1839, seq 288, length 64
13:59:21.269499 IP 192.168.120.5 > 192.168.120.10: ICMP echo request,
id 1839, seq 289, length 64
13:59:21.680458 LLDP, length 110: openflow:214083694506308
13:59:22.277524 IP 192.168.120.5 > 192.168.120.10: ICMP echo request,
id 1839, seq 290, length 64
13:59:23.285531 IP 192.168.120.5 > 192.168.120.10: ICMP echo request,
id 1839, seq 291, length 64
13:59:24.293631 IP 192.168.120.5 > 192.168.120.10: ICMP echo request,
id 1839, seq 292, length 64
13:59:25.301529 IP 192.168.120.5 > 192.168.120.10: ICMP echo request,
id 1839, seq 293, length 64
13:59:26.309588 IP 192.168.120.5 > 192.168.120.10: ICMP echo request,
id 1839, seq 294, length 64
13:59:26.680238 LLDP, length 110: openflow:214083694506308
13:59:27.317591 IP 192.168.120.5 > 192.168.120.10: ICMP echo request,
id 1839, seq 295, length 64
13:59:28.325524 IP 192.168.120.5 > 192.168.120.10: ICMP echo request,
id 1839, seq 296, length 64
13:59:29.333618 IP 192.168.120.5 > 192.168.120.10: ICMP echo request,
id 1839, seq 297, length 64
13:59:30.341515 IP 192.168.120.5 > 192.168.120.10: ICMP echo request,
id 1839, seq 298, length 64
tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol
decode
listening on ens4, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 262144 bytes
13:59:16.680452 LLDP, length 99: openflow:214083694506308
13:59:21.680791 LLDP, length 99: openflow:214083694506308
13:59:26.680532 LLDP, length 99: openflow:214083694506308
13:59:31.680503 LLDP, length 99: openflow:214083694506308
13:59:36.680681 LLDP, length 99: openflow:214083694506308
13:59:41.391777 ARP, Request who-has 192.168.120.10 tell
192.168.120.5, length 28
13:59:41.392345 ARP, Reply 192.168.120.10 is-at fa:16:3e:84:5c:29 (oui
Unknown), length 28
13:59:41.680626 LLDP, length 99: openflow:214083694506308
13:59:46.680692 LLDP, length 99: openflow:214083694506308
This is a bit confusing for me ...
First why does the echo request only appear on the OVSbr1 bridge and
not also on the ens4 ... is this correct behaviour?
and second why I got suddenly a ARP reply on ens4 which is indeed the
correct mac of the VM1 interface ...
and why the LLDP packets shown on both interfaces ...
Is now something wrong with the FlowController?
I use ODL with odl-l2switch-all feature enabled ...
puhhh ... what do I miss??? I didn't get this ...
Thx a lot Mathias.
On 2018-02-01 23:49, Volodymyr Litovka wrote:
Hi Mathias,
I'm not so fluent with OVS, but I would recommend to join bridges
using special "ports" like
Port ovsbr1-patch
Interface ovsbr1-patch
type: patch
options: {peer=ovsbr2-patch}
and vice versa, keeping "native" configuration of "port OVSbr1" and
"port OVSbr2"
And keep in mind that ARP scope is broadcast domain and, if using
just ARP (not routing), from VM1 you will be able to ping hosts,
belonging to OVSbr1, particularly - OVSbr1's IP.
On 2/1/18 4:11 PM, Mathias Strufe (DFKI) wrote:
Dear Benjamin, Volodymyr,
good question ;) ... I like to experiment with some kind of
"Firewall NFV" ... but in the first step, I want to build a Router
VM between two networks (and later extend it with some flow rules)
... OpenStack, in my case, is more a foundation to build a "test
environment" for my "own" application ... please find attached a
quick sketch of the current network ...
I did this already before with iptables inside the middle instance
... worked quite well ... but know I like to achieve the same with
OVS ...
I didn't expect that it is so much more difficult ;) ...
I'm currently checking Volodymyrs answer ... I think first point is
now solved ... I "patched" now OVSbr1 and OVSbr2 inside the VM
together (see OVpatch file)... but I think this is important later
when I really like to ping from VM1 to VM2 ... but in the moment I
only ping from VM1 to the TestNFV ... but the arp requests only
reaches ens4 but not OVSbr1 (according to tcpdump)...
May it have to do with port security and the (for OpenStack)
unknown MAC address of the OVS bridge?
Thanks so far ...
Mathias.
On 2018-02-01 14:28, Benjamin Diaz wrote:
Dear Mathias,
Could you attach a diagram of your network configuration and of
what
you are trying to achieve?
Are you trying to install OVS inside a VM? If so, why?
Greetings,
Benjamin
On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 8:30 AM, Volodymyr Litovka <doka...@gmx.com>
wrote:
Dear Mathias,
if I correctly understand your configuration, you're using bridges
inside VM and it configuration looks a bit strange:
1) you use two different bridges (OVSbr1/192.168.120.x and
OVSbr2/192.168.110.x) and there is no patch between them so they're
separate
2) while ARP requests for address in OVSbr1 arrives from OVSbr2:
18:50:58.080478 ARP, Request who-has 192.168.120.10 tell
192.168.120.6, length 28
but on the OVS bridge nothing arrives ...
listening on OVSBR2, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size
262144 bytes
while these bridges are separate, ARP requests and answers will not
be passed between them.
Regarding your devstack configuration - unfortunately, I don't have
experience with devstack, so don't know, where it stores configs.
In
Openstack, ml2_conf.ini points to openvswitch in ml2's
mechanism_drivers parameter, in my case it looks as the following:
[ml2]
mechanism_drivers = l2population,openvswitch
and rest of openvswitch config described in
/etc/neutron/plugins/ml2/openvswitch_agent.ini
Second - I see an ambiguity in your br-tun configuration, where
patch_int is the same as patch-int without corresponding remote
peer
config, probably you should check this issue.
And third is - note that Mitaka is quite old release and probably
you can give a chance for the latest release of devstack? :-)
On 1/31/18 10:49 PM, Mathias Strufe (DFKI) wrote:
Dear Volodymyr, all,
thanks for your fast answer ...
but I'm still facing the same problem, still can't ping the
instance with configured and up OVS bridge ... may because I'm
quite
new to OpenStack and OpenVswitch and didn't see the problem ;)
My setup is devstack Mitaka in single machine config ... first of
all I didn't find there the openvswitch_agent.ini anymore, I
remember in previous version it was in the neutron/plugin folder
...
Is this config now done in the ml2 config file in the [OVS]
section????
I'm really wondering ...
so I can ping between the 2 instances without any problem. But as
soon I bring up the OVS bridge inside the vm the ARP requests only
visible at the ens interface but not reaching the OVSbr ...
please find attached two files which may help for troubleshooting.
One are some network information from inside the Instance that runs
the OVS and one ovs-vsctl info of the OpenStack Host.
If you need more info/logs please let me know! Thanks for your
help!
BR Mathias.
On 2018-01-27 22:44, Volodymyr Litovka wrote:
Hi Mathias,
whether you have all corresponding bridges and patches between
them
as described in openvswitch_agent.ini using
integration_bridge
tunnel_bridge
int_peer_patch_port
tun_peer_patch_port
bridge_mappings
parameters? And make sure, that service "neutron-ovs-cleanup" is
in
use during system boot. You can check these bridges and patches
using
"ovs-vsctl show" command.
On 1/27/18 9:00 PM, Mathias Strufe (DFKI) wrote:
Dear all,
I'm quite new to openstack and like to install openVSwtich inside
one Instance of our Mitika openstack Lab Enviornment ...
But it seems that ARP packets got lost between the network
interface of the instance and the OVS bridge ...
With tcpdump on the interface I see the APR packets ...
tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol
decode
listening on ens6, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 262144
bytes
18:50:58.080478 ARP, Request who-has 192.168.120.10 tell
192.168.120.6, length 28
18:50:58.125009 ARP, Request who-has 192.168.120.1 tell
192.168.120.6, length 28
18:50:59.077315 ARP, Request who-has 192.168.120.10 tell
192.168.120.6, length 28
18:50:59.121369 ARP, Request who-has 192.168.120.1 tell
192.168.120.6, length 28
18:51:00.077327 ARP, Request who-has 192.168.120.10 tell
192.168.120.6, length 28
18:51:00.121343 ARP, Request who-has 192.168.120.1 tell
192.168.120.6, length 28
but on the OVS bridge nothing arrives ...
tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol
decode
listening on OVSbr2, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size
262144 bytes
I disabled port_security and removed the security group but nothing
changed
+-----------------------+---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Field | Value
|
+-----------------------+---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| admin_state_up | True
|
| allowed_address_pairs |
|
| binding:host_id | node11
|
| binding:profile | {}
|
| binding:vif_details | {"port_filter": true, "ovs_hybrid_plug":
true} |
| binding:vif_type | ovs
|
| binding:vnic_type | normal
|
| created_at | 2018-01-27T16:45:48Z
|
| description |
|
| device_id | 74916967-984c-4617-ae33-b847de73de13
|
| device_owner | compute:nova
|
| extra_dhcp_opts |
|
| fixed_ips | {"subnet_id":
"525db7ff-2bf2-4c64-b41e-1e41570ec358", "ip_address":
"192.168.120.10"} |
| id | 74b754d6-0000-4c2e-bfd1-87f640154ac9
|
| mac_address | fa:16:3e:af:90:0c
|
| name |
|
| network_id | 917254cb-9721-4207-99c5-8ead9f95d186
|
| port_security_enabled | False
|
| project_id | c48457e73b664147a3d2d36d75dcd155
|
| revision_number | 27
|
| security_groups |
|
| status | ACTIVE
|
| tenant_id | c48457e73b664147a3d2d36d75dcd155
|
| updated_at | 2018-01-27T18:54:24Z
|
+-----------------------+---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
maybe the port_filter causes still the problem? But how to disable
it?
Any other idea?
Thanks and BR Mathias.
_______________________________________________
Mailing list:
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack [1]
[1]
[1]
Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org
Unsubscribe :
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack [1]
[1]
[1]
--
Volodymyr Litovka
"Vision without Execution is Hallucination." -- Thomas Edison
Links:
------
[1] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
[1]
[1]
--
Volodymyr Litovka
"Vision without Execution is Hallucination." -- Thomas Edison
_______________________________________________
Mailing list:
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack [1] [1]
Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org
Unsubscribe :
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack [1] [1]
--
BENJAMÍN DÍAZ
Cloud Computing Engineer
bd...@whitestack.com
Links:
------
[1] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack [1]
--
Volodymyr Litovka
"Vision without Execution is Hallucination." -- Thomas Edison
Links:
------
[1] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
