Hi,

Le 16/01/2014 09:52, Chanho Park a écrit :
> Hi Adrian,
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Adrian Schröter [mailto:[email protected]]
>> Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2014 5:17 PM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Cc: Chanho Park
>> Subject: Re: [opensuse-arm] [AArch64] Build failure of cross-aarch64-
>> binutils
>>
>> On Donnerstag, 16. Januar 2014, 11:45:24 wrote Chanho Park:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm newbie of obs.
>>> I want to build aarch64 toolchain from scratch. To build the gcc48,
>>> it needed a cross-aarch64-binutils package.
>>> I didn't find the package from snapshot directory.
>>> So, I tried to build the package using local build.
>>>
>>> osc co devel:ARM:AArch64:Factory binutils
>>> cd devel\:ARM\:AArch64\:Factory/binutils/
>>> osc build -b standard x86_64 cross-aarch64-binutils.spec
>>>
>>> I found below error:
>>>
>>> Building cross-aarch64-binutils.spec for standard/x86_64
>>> Getting buildinfo from server and store to
>>> /opt/obs/devel:ARM:AArch64:Factory/binutils/.osc/_buildinfo-standard-
>> x86_64.
>>> xml
>>> ERROR: Either wrong repo/arch as parameter or a parse error of
>>> .spec/.dsc/.kiwi file due to syntax error
>>>
>>> Please let me know what is the  problem.
>>> Thanks.
>> There is no x86_64 architecture defined in that repository.
>>
>> It could be added, but you can also build this package source
>> with another project configuration, if you use
>>
>>   osc build --alternative-project openSUSE:13.1 standard x86_64
>>
>> for example.
> Thanks. It would really helpful for me.
>
>> However, are you aware that we do not build via cross tool chain,
>> but "natively" using the qemu-linux-aarch64 emulator?
> Yes. I already know the foundation model of ARM can be used the emulator.[1]
>
> [1] : https://en.opensuse.org/Portal:ARM/AArch64

We should be able to use qemu instead of foundation model, now.
Alex, am I right?

Guillaume

>
>> welcome at openSUSE :)
> Thanks :)
>
> Best Regards,
> Chanho Park
>
>

-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
To contact the owner, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to