Le 03/04/2014 13:17, Andreas Färber a écrit : > Hi, > > Am 17.03.2014 14:09, schrieb Guillaume Gardet: >> Le 16/03/2014 13:30, Matwey V. Kornilov a écrit : >>> It would be great if dtb-source version were in sync with the kernel one. >>> What do you think, is it worth to reimplement dtb-source, using >>> buildrequires: kernel-source instead of using linux tarball? > Yes, I had proposed the same. Dirk wanted to look up some macros for > aiding with that... :) > >> DTB files should be independent of kernel version. > Maybe they should, but in practice they aren't for new boards being > added to the kernel. Things get added to .dts in newer kernel versions > that are required for those kernels to work properly. > >> You should be able to use a dtb/dts file from kernel 3.16.* for a 3.11.* >> kernel for example. > Well, since Factory's dtb-source package will always be older-than or > equal-to kernel-source, this direction seems irrelevant. Occasionally > things get moved around, so there may be exceptions to the rule.
We could have dtb-* updates as we have kernel-* (and other packages) updates. No? Did you encountered some problems with kernel/dtb mismatch? Guillaume -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] To contact the owner, e-mail: [email protected]
