Hi Andreas, I'd appreciate if you could check with the maintainer before changing links in a project that you're always pointing out that you're not maintaining, *especially* in non-Staging projects that are supposed to be stable. if you want to do a change, you're welcome to try it out in the Staging project.
> |`- devel:ARM:Factory:Contrib:RaspberryPi2/JeOS-raspberrypi2 > | |`- devel:ARM:Factory:Contrib:RaspberryPi2/JeOS-raspberrypi3 > | | (previously a direct _link to openSUSE:Factory:ARM) > | `- devel:ARM:Factory:Contrib:RaspberryPi2:Staging/JeOS-raspberrypi2 > | `- devel:ARM:Factory:Contrib:RaspberryPi2:Staging/JeOS-raspberrypi3 > | (previously a _link to devel:ARM:Factory:Contrib:RaspberryPi2) I think this violates the rule that "JeOS-flavor link diff should be empty" rule. What I would have liked to see here instead is the creation of a JeOS main package that the others linked to, e.g. devel:ARM:Factory:Contrib:RaspberryPi2/JeOS - link to openSUSE:Factory:ARM / JeOS | ' devel:ARM:Factory:Contrib:RaspberryPi2/JeOS-raspberrypi2 - link to devel:ARM:Factory:Contrib:RaspberryPi2 / JeOS this way the JeOS-raspberrypi2 is empty and doesn't require a link diff and hence no "manual conflict resolution". In any case the linkdiff in devel:ARM:Factory:Contrib:RaspberryPi2/JeOS-raspberrypi2 was supposed to be temporary, and perhaps we should have just gotten rid of that link diff instead of making the setup now confusing and complex. Thanks, Dirk -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-arm+unsubscr...@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-arm+ow...@opensuse.org
