Hello community,

here is the log from the commit of package ghc-arithmoi for openSUSE:Factory 
checked in at 2017-09-19 16:30:26
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Comparing /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/ghc-arithmoi (Old)
 and      /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/.ghc-arithmoi.new (New)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Package is "ghc-arithmoi"

Tue Sep 19 16:30:26 2017 rev:4 rq:526708 version:0.5.0.0

Changes:
--------
--- /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/ghc-arithmoi/ghc-arithmoi.changes        
2017-08-31 21:03:24.800828210 +0200
+++ /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/.ghc-arithmoi.new/ghc-arithmoi.changes   
2017-09-19 16:31:38.345238663 +0200
@@ -1,0 +2,5 @@
+Sun Sep 17 10:29:18 UTC 2017 - psim...@suse.com
+
+- More trivial fixes to the spec file; no functional change.
+
+-------------------------------------------------------------------

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Other differences:
------------------
++++++ ghc-arithmoi.spec ++++++
--- /var/tmp/diff_new_pack.X6vSHA/_old  2017-09-19 16:31:38.929155947 +0200
+++ /var/tmp/diff_new_pack.X6vSHA/_new  2017-09-19 16:31:38.933155380 +0200
@@ -23,8 +23,8 @@
 Release:        0
 Summary:        Efficient basic number-theoretic functions
 License:        MIT
-Group:          Development/Languages/Other
-Url:            https://hackage.haskell.org/package/%{pkg_name}
+Group:          Development/Libraries/Haskell
+URL:            https://hackage.haskell.org/package/%{pkg_name}
 Source0:        
https://hackage.haskell.org/package/%{pkg_name}-%{version}/%{pkg_name}-%{version}.tar.gz
 BuildRequires:  ghc-Cabal-devel
 BuildRequires:  ghc-array-devel
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@
 
 %package devel
 Summary:        Haskell %{pkg_name} library development files
-Group:          Development/Libraries/Other
+Group:          Development/Libraries/Haskell
 Requires:       %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
 Requires:       ghc-compiler = %{ghc_version}
 Requires(post): ghc-compiler = %{ghc_version}


Reply via email to