Hello community,

here is the log from the commit of package openCryptoki for openSUSE:Factory 
checked in at 2018-03-11 15:25:39
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Comparing /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/openCryptoki (Old)
 and      /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/.openCryptoki.new (New)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Package is "openCryptoki"

Sun Mar 11 15:25:39 2018 rev:46 rq:585158 version:3.8.2

Changes:
--------
--- /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/openCryptoki/openCryptoki.changes        
2017-12-03 10:12:50.324259812 +0100
+++ /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/.openCryptoki.new/openCryptoki.changes   
2018-03-11 15:25:39.878325567 +0100
@@ -1,0 +2,5 @@
+Fri Mar  9 19:25:51 UTC 2018 - mp...@suse.com
+
+- Re-enabled ARM architectures now that gcc6 is in SLE15. (bsc#1084617)
+
+-------------------------------------------------------------------

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Other differences:
------------------
++++++ openCryptoki.spec ++++++
--- /var/tmp/diff_new_pack.YuW286/_old  2018-03-11 15:25:40.554301316 +0100
+++ /var/tmp/diff_new_pack.YuW286/_new  2018-03-11 15:25:40.558301172 +0100
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 #
 # spec file for package openCryptoki
 #
-# Copyright (c) 2017 SUSE LINUX GmbH, Nuernberg, Germany.
+# Copyright (c) 2018 SUSE LINUX GmbH, Nuernberg, Germany.
 #
 # All modifications and additions to the file contributed by third parties
 # remain the property of their copyright owners, unless otherwise agreed
@@ -16,12 +16,10 @@
 #
 
 
-# Remove %%arm until gcc6 is in SLES.
-%define openCryptoki_32bit_arch %ix86 s390 ppc
+%define openCryptoki_32bit_arch %arm %ix86 s390 ppc
 # support in the workings for: ppc64
 # no support in sight for: ia64
-# Remove aarch64 until gcc6 is in SLES.
-%define openCryptoki_64bit_arch s390x ppc64 ppc64le x86_64
+%define openCryptoki_64bit_arch aarch64 s390x ppc64 ppc64le x86_64
 # autobuild:/work/cd/lib/misc/group
 #   openCryptoki    pkcs11:x:64:
 %define pkcs11_group_id 64


Reply via email to