Hello community,

here is the log from the commit of package coq for openSUSE:Factory checked in 
at 2020-06-07 21:37:49
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Comparing /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/coq (Old)
 and      /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/.coq.new.3606 (New)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Package is "coq"

Sun Jun  7 21:37:49 2020 rev:5 rq:812064 version:8.11.2

Changes:
--------
--- /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/coq/coq.changes  2020-04-09 23:17:59.774332650 
+0200
+++ /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/.coq.new.3606/coq.changes        2020-06-07 
21:38:17.661445539 +0200
@@ -1,0 +2,14 @@
+Sat Jun  6 12:11:06 UTC 2020 - Aaron Puchert <aaronpuch...@alice-dsl.net>
+
+- Update to version 8.11.2.
+  * Fixed a kernel issue where using Require inside a section
+    caused an anomaly when closing the section.
+  * Fixed normalization in conclusion of custom induction scheme.
+  * Fixed a loss of location of some tactic errors.
+  * Ignore -native-compiler option when built without native
+    compute support.
+  * Fixed a segfault issue with CoqIDE completion.
+  * Highlighting style is now consistently applied to all three
+    buffers of CoqIDE.
+
+-------------------------------------------------------------------

Old:
----
  coq-8.11.1.tar.gz

New:
----
  coq-8.11.2.tar.gz

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Other differences:
------------------
++++++ coq.spec ++++++
--- /var/tmp/diff_new_pack.Hd8ssM/_old  2020-06-07 21:38:18.229447340 +0200
+++ /var/tmp/diff_new_pack.Hd8ssM/_new  2020-06-07 21:38:18.233447353 +0200
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@
 
 
 Name:           coq
-Version:        8.11.1
+Version:        8.11.2
 Release:        0
 Summary:        Proof Assistant based on the Calculus of Inductive 
Constructions
 License:        LGPL-2.1-only

++++++ coq-8.11.1.tar.gz -> coq-8.11.2.tar.gz ++++++
/work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/coq/coq-8.11.1.tar.gz 
/work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/.coq.new.3606/coq-8.11.2.tar.gz differ: char 16, 
line 1


Reply via email to