Hello community,

here is the log from the commit of package python-numpy for openSUSE:Factory 
checked in at 2013-12-08 19:46:07
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Comparing /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/python-numpy (Old)
 and      /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/.python-numpy.new (New)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Package is "python-numpy"

Changes:
--------
--- /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/python-numpy/python-numpy.changes        
2013-11-14 08:43:29.000000000 +0100
+++ /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/.python-numpy.new/python-numpy.changes   
2013-12-08 19:46:08.000000000 +0100
@@ -1,0 +2,5 @@
+Thu Dec  5 11:17:52 CET 2013 - m...@suse.de
+
+- add numpy-double-double-le.patch for ppc64le
+
+-------------------------------------------------------------------

New:
----
  numpy-double-double-le.patch

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Other differences:
------------------
++++++ python-numpy.spec ++++++
--- /var/tmp/diff_new_pack.fQjkl8/_old  2013-12-08 19:46:09.000000000 +0100
+++ /var/tmp/diff_new_pack.fQjkl8/_new  2013-12-08 19:46:09.000000000 +0100
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
 Group:          Development/Libraries/Python
 Source:         
http://sourceforge.net/projects/numpy/files/NumPy/%{version}/%{modname}-%{version}.tar.gz
 Patch0:         numpy-buildfix.patch
+Patch1:         numpy-double-double-le.patch
 BuildRoot:      %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-build
 BuildRequires:  blas-devel
 BuildRequires:  lapack-devel
@@ -88,6 +89,7 @@
 %prep
 %setup -q -n %{modname}-%{version}
 %patch0 -p1
+%patch1
 # Fix non-executable scripts
 sed -i "1d" 
numpy/{compat/setup,distutils/{conv_template,cpuinfo,exec_command,from_template,setup,system_info},f2py/{auxfuncs,capi_maps,cb_rules,cfuncs,common_rules,crackfortran,diagnose,docs/usersguide/setup_example,f2py2e,f90mod_rules,func2subr,__init__,rules,setup,use_rules},ma/setup,matrixlib/setup,setup,testing/{print_coercion_tables,setup}}.py
 

++++++ numpy-double-double-le.patch ++++++
--- ./numpy/core/setup.py.orig  2013-12-05 10:09:02.655607503 +0000
+++ ./numpy/core/setup.py       2013-12-05 10:10:06.126607391 +0000
@@ -465,7 +465,7 @@ def configuration(parent_package='',top_
                            'MOTOROLA_EXTENDED_12_BYTES_BE',
                            'IEEE_QUAD_LE', 'IEEE_QUAD_BE',
                            'IEEE_DOUBLE_LE', 'IEEE_DOUBLE_BE',
-                           'DOUBLE_DOUBLE_BE']:
+                           'DOUBLE_DOUBLE_BE', 'DOUBLE_DOUBLE_LE']:
                     moredefs.append(('HAVE_LDOUBLE_%s' % rep, 1))
                 else:
                     raise ValueError("Unrecognized long double format: %s" % 
rep)
--- ./numpy/core/setup_common.py.orig   2013-12-05 10:09:12.407607486 +0000
+++ ./numpy/core/setup_common.py        2013-12-05 10:12:04.389607182 +0000
@@ -256,6 +256,8 @@ _IEEE_QUAD_PREC_BE = ['300', '031', '326
 _IEEE_QUAD_PREC_LE = _IEEE_QUAD_PREC_BE[::-1]
 _DOUBLE_DOUBLE_BE = ['301', '235', '157', '064', '124', '000', '000', '000'] + 
\
                     ['000'] * 8
+_DOUBLE_DOUBLE_LE = ['000', '000', '000', '124', '064', '157', '235', '301'] + 
\
+                    ['000'] * 8
 
 def long_double_representation(lines):
     """Given a binary dump as given by GNU od -b, look for long double
@@ -295,6 +297,8 @@ def long_double_representation(lines):
                         return 'IEEE_QUAD_LE'
                     elif read[8:-8] == _DOUBLE_DOUBLE_BE:
                         return 'DOUBLE_DOUBLE_BE'
+                    elif read[8:-8] == _DOUBLE_DOUBLE_LE:
+                        return 'DOUBLE_DOUBLE_LE'
                 elif read[:16] == _BEFORE_SEQ:
                     if read[16:-8] == _IEEE_DOUBLE_LE:
                         return 'IEEE_DOUBLE_LE'
--- ./numpy/core/src/npymath/ieee754.c.src.orig 2013-12-05 10:27:37.806605529 
+0000
+++ ./numpy/core/src/npymath/ieee754.c.src      2013-12-05 10:15:22.245606831 
+0000
@@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ float _nextf(float x, int p)
     return x;
 }
 
-#ifdef HAVE_LDOUBLE_DOUBLE_DOUBLE_BE
+#if defined(HAVE_LDOUBLE_DOUBLE_DOUBLE_BE) || 
defined(HAVE_LDOUBLE_DOUBLE_DOUBLE_LE)
 
 /*
  * FIXME: this is ugly and untested. The asm part only works with gcc, and we
--- ./numpy/core/src/npymath/npy_math_private.h.orig    2013-12-05 
10:09:39.735607438 +0000
+++ ./numpy/core/src/npymath/npy_math_private.h 2013-12-05 10:13:51.717606992 
+0000
@@ -435,7 +435,7 @@ do {
     typedef npy_uint32 ldouble_sign_t;
 #endif
 
-#ifndef HAVE_LDOUBLE_DOUBLE_DOUBLE_BE
+#if !defined(HAVE_LDOUBLE_DOUBLE_DOUBLE_BE) && 
!defined(HAVE_LDOUBLE_DOUBLE_DOUBLE_LE)
 /* Get the sign bit of x. x should be of type IEEEl2bitsrep */
 #define GET_LDOUBLE_SIGN(x) \
     (((x).a[LDBL_SIGN_INDEX] & LDBL_SIGN_MASK) >> LDBL_SIGN_SHIFT)
@@ -476,7 +476,7 @@ do {
      ((x).a[LDBL_MANH_INDEX] & ~LDBL_MANH_MASK) |                       \
      (((IEEEl2bitsrep_part)(v) << LDBL_MANH_SHIFT) & LDBL_MANH_MASK))
 
-#endif /* #ifndef HAVE_LDOUBLE_DOUBLE_DOUBLE_BE */
+#endif /* #if !defined(HAVE_LDOUBLE_DOUBLE_DOUBLE_BE) && 
!defined(HAVE_LDOUBLE_DOUBLE_DOUBLE_LE) */
 
 /*
  * Those unions are used to convert a pointer of npy_cdouble to native C99
--- ./numpy/core/src/private/npy_fpmath.h.orig  2013-12-05 10:09:28.015607458 
+0000
+++ ./numpy/core/src/private/npy_fpmath.h       2013-12-05 10:12:49.261607102 
+0000
@@ -41,7 +41,8 @@
       defined(HAVE_LDOUBLE_INTEL_EXTENDED_16_BYTES_LE) || \
       defined(HAVE_LDOUBLE_INTEL_EXTENDED_12_BYTES_LE) || \
       defined(HAVE_LDOUBLE_MOTOROLA_EXTENDED_12_BYTES_BE) || \
-      defined(HAVE_LDOUBLE_DOUBLE_DOUBLE_BE))
+      defined(HAVE_LDOUBLE_DOUBLE_DOUBLE_BE) || \
+      defined(HAVE_LDOUBLE_DOUBLE_DOUBLE_LE))
     #error No long double representation defined
 #endif
 
-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-commit+unsubscr...@opensuse.org
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-commit+h...@opensuse.org

Reply via email to