Hello community,

here is the log from the commit of package apache2-mod_nss for openSUSE:Factory 
checked in at 2016-01-23 01:16:27
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Comparing /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/apache2-mod_nss (Old)
 and      /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/.apache2-mod_nss.new (New)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Package is "apache2-mod_nss"

Changes:
--------
--- /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/apache2-mod_nss/apache2-mod_nss.changes  
2015-12-21 12:04:38.000000000 +0100
+++ /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/.apache2-mod_nss.new/apache2-mod_nss.changes     
2016-01-23 01:16:32.000000000 +0100
@@ -1,0 +2,5 @@
+Tue Jan 12 08:31:19 UTC 2016 - pgaj...@suse.com
+
+- %check: access syntax depends on %{apache_branch}
+
+-------------------------------------------------------------------

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Other differences:
------------------
++++++ apache2-mod_nss.spec ++++++
--- /var/tmp/diff_new_pack.26NAUP/_old  2016-01-23 01:16:33.000000000 +0100
+++ /var/tmp/diff_new_pack.26NAUP/_new  2016-01-23 01:16:33.000000000 +0100
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 #
 # spec file for package apache2-mod_nss
 #
-# Copyright (c) 2015 SUSE LINUX GmbH, Nuernberg, Germany.
+# Copyright (c) 2016 SUSE LINUX GmbH, Nuernberg, Germany.
 #
 # All modifications and additions to the file contributed by third parties
 # remain the property of their copyright owners, unless otherwise agreed
@@ -202,7 +202,11 @@
 NSSCipherSuite 
+ecdhe_ecdsa_aes_128_gcm_sha,+ecdh_ecdsa_aes_128_gcm_sha,+ecdhe_rsa_aes_256_sha,+ecdh_rsa_aes_256_sha,+ecdhe_rsa_aes_128_gcm_sha,+ecdh_rsa_aes_128_gcm_sha,+ecdhe_rsa_aes_128_sha,+ecdh_rsa_aes_128_sha,+rsa_aes_128_gcm_sha,+rsa_aes_256_sha,+rsa_aes_128_sha,+rsa_aes_128_sha256,+rsa_aes_256_sha256
 NSSProtocol TLSv1.0,TLSv1.1,TLSv1.2
 <Directory /tmp/apache2-mod_nss_test/htdocs>
+%if 0%{?apache_branch} >= 204
   Require local
+%else
+  Allow from localhost
+%endif
 </Directory>
 EOF
 # create test certificate


Reply via email to