Hello community,
here is the log from the commit of package lvm2 for openSUSE:Factory checked in
at 2016-03-09 15:15:56
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Comparing /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/lvm2 (Old)
and /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/.lvm2.new (New)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Package is "lvm2"
Changes:
--------
--- /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/lvm2/lvm2.changes 2016-02-03
10:17:36.000000000 +0100
+++ /work/SRC/openSUSE:Factory/.lvm2.new/lvm2.changes 2016-03-09
15:15:57.000000000 +0100
@@ -1,0 +2,8 @@
+Mon Mar 7 01:53:34 UTC 2016 - lw...@suse.com
+
+- not output error message inside retry loops to avoid noisy error
+ message being output inside retry loops in case of remove failure
+ because device busy. (bsc#940298 boo#957059)
+ add: libdm-iface-not-output-error-message-inside-retry-loop.patch
+
+-------------------------------------------------------------------
New:
----
libdm-iface-not-output-error-message-inside-retry-loop.patch
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Other differences:
------------------
++++++ lvm2.spec ++++++
--- /var/tmp/diff_new_pack.Fqs4Vf/_old 2016-03-09 15:15:59.000000000 +0100
+++ /var/tmp/diff_new_pack.Fqs4Vf/_new 2016-03-09 15:15:59.000000000 +0100
@@ -88,6 +88,7 @@
Patch2007: fsadm-add-support-for-btrfs.patch
Patch2008: Import-ID_FS_XXX-variables-bnc909358.patch
Patch2009: 10-dm.rules-Reset-state-variable-for-spurious-events.patch
+Patch2010: libdm-iface-not-output-error-message-inside-retry-loop.patch
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-build
BuildRequires: autoconf
@@ -155,6 +156,7 @@
%patch2007 -p1
%patch2008 -p1
%patch2009 -p1
+%patch2010 -p1
%build
#set path so that thin_check can be found
++++++ libdm-iface-not-output-error-message-inside-retry-loop.patch ++++++
>From a70f17fd1dc9a8cccefb946c3501d5cb6f2766bb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Liuhua Wang <lw...@suse.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 13:49:39 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] libdm-iface: not output error message inside retry loops
This is a workaround to avoid noisy error message being output inside retry
loops
in case of remove failure because device busy. But as to the replies from
upstream
there may be some issues in udev operations.
References: bsc#940298 boo#957059
Signed-off-by: lw...@suse.com
---
libdm/ioctl/libdm-iface.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Index: LVM2.2.02.141/libdm/ioctl/libdm-iface.c
===================================================================
--- LVM2.2.02.141.orig/libdm/ioctl/libdm-iface.c
+++ LVM2.2.02.141/libdm/ioctl/libdm-iface.c
@@ -62,6 +62,7 @@
*/
#define MAPPER_CTRL_MINOR 236
#define MISC_MAJOR 10
+#define DM_IOCTL_RETRIES 25
/* dm major version no for running kernel */
static unsigned _dm_version = DM_VERSION_MAJOR;
@@ -1862,7 +1863,7 @@ static struct dm_ioctl *_do_dm_ioctl(str
dmt->major > 0 && dmt->minor == 0 ?
"0" : "",
dmt->major > 0 ? ")" : "",
strerror(dmt->ioctl_errno));
- else
+ else if(errno != EBUSY || retry_repeat_count == DM_IOCTL_RETRIES)
log_error("device-mapper: %s ioctl on
%s%s%s%.0d%s%.0d%s%s "
"failed: %s",
_cmd_data_v4[dmt->type].name,
@@ -1915,7 +1916,6 @@ void dm_task_update_nodes(void)
update_devs();
}
-#define DM_IOCTL_RETRIES 25
#define DM_RETRY_USLEEP_DELAY 200000
int dm_task_get_errno(struct dm_task *dmt)
