Robert Schiele wrote: > It would be useful if you read the other mails of this thread before answering > because in the very beginning I already mentioned the reason why this is not > practical: > > "If SUSE (or any other vendor) started to ship compilers for every variant > of broken code floating around in the world they would end up shipping all > versions of gcc ever released or even those that were never released."
Of course, nobody is asking for "compilers for every variant of broken code", but please, code which has been compiling without any problems in our data center environment for nearly a decade on all linux variants and several other unix platforms, is now deemed broken because it won't build with gcc 4? In short, if there were simply an optional gcc-compat package (e.g. 3.3 or 2.95) it would make everybody happy - Joe --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
