Frank-Michael Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>> Frank-Michael Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>   
>>> The reason why I am assuming it's libzypp's fault is: when I filed the
>>> bug it was for the Zen component, then Nat Budin changed the component
>>> to libzypp and connected this bug with bug 176301. This bug I am not
>>> supposed to view.  So it's fair to guess there is something rotten in
>>> the state of libzypp. And we should not participate, just sit and wait.
>>>     
>>
>> Why is everybody thinking there's something rotten going on if a bug
>> is closed?
>>
>>   
>
> Not because it's closed. I could not even know that. It's because I am
> not supposed to know the bug. This creates the "rotten" suspicion.

"closed " was meant in the sense of "private"/"non-public",

Andreas
-- 
 Andreas Jaeger, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.suse.de/~aj/
  SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
   GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F  FED1 389A 563C C272 A126

Attachment: pgpfWrGU14Cm0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to