Anders Johansson schrieb: > On Sunday 26 November 2006 14:01, Robert Schiele wrote: > >> On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 01:13:45PM +0100, Anders Johansson wrote: >> >>> I can't say why it should be slower, but since it shouldn't be used at >>> all, it doesn't seem to matter much >>> >> That depends on your point of view. From a user's point of view this is >> really pointless because it does not make any sense at all to use such a >> scenario on any productive system. For the developer of the code such >> observations could be quite valuable because the process of finding an >> explanation for such strange observations often uncover obscure bugs or >> design issues. >> > > It could be as simple as the RAM disk taking up memory that would otherwise > be > used for buffering. Reducing the size of the buffers can cause substantial > performance loss Not really in my case, only about 50% of memory in use including the 32MB ram disk. FMF --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
