Rajko M wrote:
On Tuesday 05 December 2006 00:41, Basil Chupin wrote:
Vahis wrote:
houghi wrote:
On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 07:06:15PM -0600, Rajko M wrote:
We thought about the problem and it is obvious that we can't agree that
one size fit all.
By now we have this:
http://en.opensuse.org
http://en.opensuse.org/SUPER
http://en.opensuse.org/1_CD_Install
http://en.opensuse.org/MiniSUSE
http://en.opensuse.org/JackLab
already mentioned
http://en.opensuse.org/MicroSUSE
and more comming in, like:
http://en.opensuse.org/Education
....
PocketSUSE
PygmySUSE
PetiteSUSE
Hi Basil,
The names existed before whole hype and I'm sure that no one will change them
to accommodate daily needs for appropriate naming. I guess that jdd will vote
for PetiteSUSE, but that has nothing to do with a hype ;-)
I personally will keep MiniSUSE as it reflects the goal.
I thought that more people with underpowered machines are present on openSUSE,
but that is obviously not the case :-)
The rest of names is also pretty clear what the aim is.
I thought the discussion was about the name MicroSUSE and not MiniSUSE
(I've got no hassles with MiniSUSE).
For MicroSUSE I can also recommend 'BilbySUSE' - see picture:
http://www.abchsn.com/aus_wildlife/bilby.html
Cheers.
--
In a period of great joy and pleasure you are comforted by the thought
that tragedy is just around the corner.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
