On Tuesday 01 May 2007 01:37, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > Felix Miata <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > What I did: > > ... > > > > On my 10.2 smbfs.ko is only size 75753. Why do my modules consume > > 9.2 times as much overall disk space as the stock modules? What did > > I do wrong? > > Stripping? We apply strip unneeded during RPM build,
I'd thought of that, but as an experiment, I looked at the kernel modules on my 10.0 system (105 of them are present in /lib/modules/2.6.13-15.11-smp) and all of them are like this one: % file extra/acx_pci.ko extra/acx_pci.ko: ELF 32-bit LSB relocatable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), not stripped According to nm, that particular module (the first in an alphabetical list) has 384 symbols: % nm extra/acx_pci.ko |wc -l 384 > Andreas Randall Schulz --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]