On Tue, 29 Jan 2008, Dirk Mueller wrote: > On Tuesday 29 January 2008, Stephan Kulow wrote: > > > But the warning is not fatal. It would mean way too many fallouts for false > > positives. > > Well, it was just a general topic, but while we're talking on this > specifically: by definition there can't be false positives > for -Wstrict-prototypes. And the reason for them being turned on is (iirc)
The most common "false positive" is void foo(); for declaring a function which takes no parameters (which is not a correct prototype for C, but is for C++). Richard. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
