Lyle Greg Lisle wrote: > jdd wrote: >> Lyle Greg Lisle a écrit : >> >>> but we have a few problems. First, I'm not sure why, but I couldn't >>> see any SLC's on your page. >> >> "**" ones >> What I could see of the TLCs looks very >>> good, although I'm sure there are some things that could be added. >>> Candidates might include installation and user environments. I agree >>> that "documentation" does not need to be there, particularly since it >>> is in the left hand column. >>> >>> Second, why do you feel the applications need to be TLCs? >> >> apps are not TLC >> >> This would >>> lead to an ever growing list and would seriously clutter the TLC >>> page. Unless they could be put in a separate column they need to be >>> lowered to SLC status. >>> >>> Third, and most difficult, we do not have much (any?) control over >>> how the TLCs are displayed, unless you propose building (and >>> maintaining) a manual TLC page. >> >> of course. Is tlc are in small amount, this is not difficult >> >> jdd >> >> > Doubly confused. I see no asterisks on the page (except the header) > [Running Seamonkey] > > Or is your TLC list just: > By line of business > By application Names > Experience level > By skills > > This is WAY too short. Still confused. >
It is displayed now, at least in Firefox, old Mozilla browser and Konqueror. The point is, now when Jean started this, to think about and see how develop system that will work good with present structure of articles on the wiki. It is really huge task that we should do once and than maintain. I agree about manually maintained index(es). That would be the way around pure alphabetical order that in case of subpages works really bad. All HCL/* are under letter H. Greg you are, as native English speaker, in the best position to propose names for categories. -- Regards, Rajko. Visit http://en.opensuse.org/MiniSUSE --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
