Am Samstag, 7. September 2013, 20:15:30 schrieb Tobias Klausmann: > Hey there, > while seeing the new submit request > (https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/197847) and with it the loss of > the comments to the previous submit request (hidden in that request), > here now a message to all involved (and interested) people. > > Johannes, > personally i'd really like to have your changes in Mesa but sumski and > i, we had some concerns noted in the comments of the previous SR (maybe > you want to look at them): > > - Do you think this is stable enough for 13.1? (or at least a broader > audience not willing to test bleeding edge software)
See below. But yes it is stable. Even more it should fix some upstream issues like EGL runtime error: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=64810 Also Ubuntu builds e. g. libgallium and libmesagallium shared but not with this buildtime speedup shown in my patches: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-branches/ubuntu/saucy/mesa/saucy/view/head:/debian/patches/117-static-gallium.patch http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-branches/ubuntu/saucy/mesa/saucy/view/head:/debian/patches/118-dricore-gallium.patch > - Will this go into Mesa mainline soon? Anytime? It's quite a deviation > from upstream. Sorry for German: Damit ich mich nicht immer über die unnötigen Diskussionen, das Bitten und Betteln sowie der einhergehenden Ignoranz der Upstream-Entwickler - selbst bei Patches zur Behebung trivialer Kompilierfehler - ärgern muss, habe ich Einspielrechte beantragt: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69053 I want to maintain master-shared and 9.2-shared branches there until upstream come up to accept them ... > - Why did you remove several packages? See below (unneccesary). > - Split the huge patch for easier overview. https://github.com/jobermayr/mesa/commits/9.2 or for mesa master: https://github.com/jobermayr/mesa/commits/master > > PS: Hopefully i did understand your comment right sumski ;) > > Thanks, > Tobias > Am Samstag, 7. September 2013, 19:05:11 schrieb Johannes Obermayr: > New SR: > https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/197847 > > - Drop u_mesa-glapi_dispatch.patch > + Upstream: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/commit/?id=5ea43e6 > > It is now possible to use $(VISIBILITY_CFLAGS) also for glsl: > https://build.opensuse.org/package/rdiff/home:jobermayr:branches:X11:XOrg/Mesa?linkrev=base&rev=8 > So only required symbols are visible from now on :) > > Btw. You can see how difficult it is to get even agreed patches upstreamed: > http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/2013-September/044341.html > > Am Donnerstag, 5. September 2013, 15:41:30 schrieb Johannes Obermayr: > > Am Donnerstag, 5. September 2013, 14:25:05 schrieb Stefan Dirsch: > > > Hi Johannes > > > > > > I'm afraid we need to discuss these changes. Adding Egbert and Michal. > > > > > > Comments see below. > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 09:11:45PM +0000, johannesoberm...@gmx.de wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > home:jobermayr:branches:X11:XOrg/Mesa -> X11:XOrg/Mesa > > > > > > > > > > > > https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/197345 > > > > > > > > Description: See Mesa.changes > > > > > > > > changes files: > > > > -------------- > > > > --- Mesa.changes > > > > +++ Mesa.changes > > > > @@ -1,0 +2,23 @@ > > > > +Tue Sep 3 21:02:55 UTC 2013 - johannesoberm...@gmx.de > > > > + > > > > +- Drop 0011_u_Fix-crash-in-swrast-when-setting-a-texture-for.patch > > > > + + > > > > http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/2013-September/044182.html > > > > > > It's no longer applicable, which does not necessarily mean, that the > > > issue has > > > been resolved. > > > > That's right. But I could see it has been disabled for ~ 1 1/2 years: > > https://build.opensuse.org/package/rdiff/X11:XOrg/Mesa?linkrev=base&rev=196 > > > > > > > > > +- Drop 0017_u_mesa-9.0-i965-Make-sure-we-do-render-between.patch > > > > + + Upstream: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/commit/?id=1dfea55 > > > > > > I do not see how this git commit is related to the patch. Could you > > > elaborate? > > > > Discussion with the author in #dri-devel: > > [Sonntag, 1. September 2013] [15:39:34] <jobermayr> marcheu: Is this patch > > obsolete: > > https://build.opensuse.org/package/view_file/X11:XOrg/Mesa/u_mesa-9.0-i965-Make-sure-we-do-render-between-two-hiz-flushes.patch?expand=1 > > [Sonntag, 1. September 2013] [20:53:51] <marcheu> jobermayr: yup anholt > > fixed it in git mesa > > [Sonntag, 1. September 2013] [22:10:24] <jobermayr> marcheu: That means it > > is still required in 9.2 branch? > > [Sonntag, 1. September 2013] [22:13:51] <marcheu> I don't think so, check > > for anholt's commit about URB > > [Sonntag, 1. September 2013] [22:17:39] <marcheu> > > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/commit/?id=1dfea559c3f188a7a82a4abc09765ba09e939522 > > [Sonntag, 1. September 2013] [22:18:53] <jobermayr> Thanks. > > > > > > > > > +------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > +Sat Aug 31 18:00:20 UTC 2013 - johannesoberm...@gmx.de > > > > + > > > > +- Drop IndirectGL/osmesa > > > > + + Use --enable-osmesa instead > > > > > > ok > > > > > > > + + Remove Mesa-libIndirectGL0 and Mesa-libIndirectGL-devel packages > > > > > > Why? We needed this lib in the past. Unfortunately I no longer can > > > remember, > > > for which purposes and which software components. compiz or some related > > > lib > > > maybe? Anyway, theoretically it should also be possible to use the regular > > > libGL with indirect rendering and software rendering though by setting > > > > > > LIBGL_ALWAYS_INDIRECT/LIBGL_ALWAYS_SOFTWARE > > > > > > environment variables. > > > > > > --> http://tirdc.livejournal.com/24963.html > > > > > > So, from my side I would like to accept these changes. > > > > > > > + + Speed up build > > > > > > Sure, that's true. > > > > > > > +- Use patchset from https://github.com/jobermayr/mesa/commits/9.2 > > > > + + Add 0018_u_build_shared.tar.bz2 > > > > + + Build as much shared as possible to remove duplicates in binaries > > > > + + Less memory consumption at runtime > > > > > > Please push this patch uptream. Otherwise we cannot accept. Last time we > > > tried > > > to share code in DRI drivers we failed miserably (undefined symbols)! BTW, > > > this is a patch, not a tarball (of patches). ;-) > > > > I am working with Andreas Boll (aboll) from Intel to upstream it. But my > > experience is same as always: maintainers first welcome to do things, then > > when I try to upstream well tested work they don't push - even more: they > > show intolerable! and don't reply ... :-( > > > > Don't think about undefined symbols. I set for each shared lib > > "-Wl,--no-undefined": https://github.com/jobermayr/mesa/commit/cd04198 or > > commented what TODO > > > > You can also see in this patchset fixes for a lot of undefined symbols ... > > Because of my stupidness I even had to make all symbols in glsl visible to > > fix two of them: https://github.com/jobermayr/mesa/commit/bf17997 > > > > This is well tested on a AMD Fusion (r600), Nvidia ION (nouveau) and ATI > > Mobility Radeon (r200). > > > > To say it like our last minister of defence: "[...] in mühevollster > > Kleinstarbeit [...]" :) > > > > > > > > > + + Remove Mesa-libglapi0 and Mesa-libglapi-devel packages > > > > > > Why? Is this the consequence of your patch to share as much code as > > > possible? > > > > Because Mesa's internal libs are now in > > %_libdir/mesa-9.2.0/* or %_libdir/mesa-9.3.0-devel/* > > which belongs to Mesa package ... > > > > Please don't split Mesa package more. Because of the dependencies IMHO > > there should even be only Mesa and Mesa-devel package ... > > > > > > > > > + + Speed up build > > > > +- Prefix numbers to patches > > > > > > If really helpful/required, we want it the other way round, i.e. > > > u_XXXX_... > > > > I am trying to make Adam Jackson (ajax) to upstream 0013 and 0015 ;) > > > > <snip> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-xorg+unsubscr...@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-xorg+ow...@opensuse.org
